Nils Philippsen (nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Known, which is why this package already includes: > > Conflicts: libc-client-devel > > A smarter version of this script could probably omit bits already marked > > with a Conflicts: tag. (: > > Somehow this strikes me as wrong... Either uw-imap-devel supersedes > libc-client-devel or vice versa (then one should also obsolete the > other) or they are independent things (in which case the file conflicts > should be solved, e.g. by using separate base directories for the > files). Consdering they come from the same code base... why would you use one and not the other? Bill -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
