On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:18:42PM +1000, David Timms wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > >Hi, > > > >currently the new package creation process in bugzilla: > > > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora%20Extras&format=extras-review > > > >suggests using "Review Request: <main package name here>" in > >bugzilla's summary. It would make the sent mails and bugzilla browsing > >much more interesting if the package's purpose could already be read > >off this one-liner. > > > >Currently I see some submitted packages and unless I already know the > >project I can't associate anything with it. > > > >Some submitters are already adding the package's summary to > >bugzilla's, but if the URL above would change the template to suggest > >always doing so, that would be perfect, thanks! :) > Is there a limit to the length of the summary field ? Some complicated > packages are pretty hard to summarize in a few words ;) I hope there is a limit. Complicated or not Summaries should be summaries, I'd even like an rpmlint option to warn when summaries are half the package's content. > --- > I would like to see a final item added to the guidelines: This is completely off-topic to this thread (also known as thread hijacking). Why not open up a new one instead? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpHG1wGwJ6OM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
