Fedora Extras

• Thread Index

• Re: adding optipng to extras
  • From: dragoran
• Re: adding optipng to extras
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: [Fedora-infrastructure-list] Extras Package Database
  • From: Elliot Lee
• Fwd: [Fedora-infrastructure-list] New package version control
  • From: Elliot Lee
• Re: adding optipng to extras
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: adding optipng to extras
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• adding optipng to extras
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Mass rebuild of Extras packages for FC6? (was: Re: Mass rebuild of core packages coming soon)
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: Removing zoo from Fedora Extras
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: soname change policy proposal
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Removing zoo from Fedora Extras
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: soname change policy proposal
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: soname change policy proposal
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Removing zoo from Fedora Extras
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• fc5.90/fc5.91/... disttags and automated rebuilds (was: Mass rebuild of Extras packages for FC6?)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: extras mirrorlist with out-of-date mirrors
  • From: David Timms
• Re: Mass rebuild of Extras packages for FC6?
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Mass rebuild of Extras packages for FC6? (was: Re: Mass rebuild of core packages coming soon)
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: extras mirrorlist with out-of-date mirrors
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Mass rebuild of Extras packages for FC6? (was: Re: Mass rebuild of core packages coming soon)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• FESCo election -- only some hours left, go vote
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: extras mirrorlist with out-of-date mirrors
  • From: David Timms
• Re: [Fedora-infrastructure-list] Extras Package Database
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• extras mirrorlist with out-of-date mirrors
  • From: Ian Burrell
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-30
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-30
  • From: Matt Domsch
• [Bug 175201] Review Request: python-cheetah
  • From: bugzilla
• packaging a lib which needs to be compiled in different ways for different users
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-29
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-29
  • From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-29
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Extras Package Database
  • From: Elliot Lee
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-29
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Changing the default font in Fedora Core 6
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Changing the default font in Fedora Core 6
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Re: Changing the default font in Fedora Core 6
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting (2006-06-29)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-29
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Changing the default font in Fedora Core 6
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Clarification on Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Changing the default font in Fedora Core 6
  • From: Dimitris Glezos
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-29
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-29
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-29
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-29
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-29
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-29
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-29
  • From: buildsys
• Re: PHP packaging guidelines not yet accepted
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: pcap.h changed in devel/rawhide (fc6) ?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: pcap.h changed in devel/rawhide (fc6) ?
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-29
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-29
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-28
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-28
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-28
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: plague-client list failing
  • From: Ian Burrell
• PHP packaging guidelines not yet accepted
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: plague-client list failing
  • From: Dennis Gregorovic
• Re: plague-client list failing
  • From: Dan Williams
• Re: Clarification on Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Paul Howarth
• plague-client list failing
  • From: Ian Burrell
• Re: Clarification on Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Eric Work
• Re: Clarification on Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Clarification on Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Clarification on Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Denis Leroy
• Re: Clarification on Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Testers with radeon 9600 or 9800 wanted for new 3D package
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Clarification on Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Clarification on Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Denis Leroy
• Re: fedora legacy broken upgrade paths (was: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-28)
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Testers with radeon 9600 or 9800 wanted for new 3D package
  • From: dragoran
• Re: Clarification on Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Testers with radeon 9600 or 9800 wanted for new 3D package
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: Testers with radeon 9600 or 9800 wanted for new 3D package
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: fedora legacy broken upgrade paths (was: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-28)
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Testers with radeon 9600 or 9800 wanted for new 3D package
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Testers with radeon 9600 or 9800 wanted for new 3D package
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: Testers with radeon 9600 or 9800 wanted for new 3D package
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Testers with radeon 9600 or 9800 wanted for new 3D package
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: My BZs
  • From: Paul
• Re: Clarification on Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: My BZs
  • From: David Howells
• RE: wp_tray rebuild
  • From: Chris Chabot
• fedora legacy broken upgrade paths (was: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-28)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-28
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Broken upgrade paths discussion
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: soname change policy proposal
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Broken upgrade paths discussion
  • From: Jarod Wilson
• Re: pcap.h changed in devel/rawhide (fc6) ?
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Broken upgrade paths discussion
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Clarification on Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Eric Work
• Re: FYI: gaim-2.0.0 beta3 in FC6
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: wp_tray rebuild
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• wp_tray rebuild
  • From: Denis Leroy
• Re: pcap.h changed in devel/rawhide (fc6) ?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: My BZs
  • From: Peter Gordon
• [resolved] Re: Importing Openbox with common/cvs-import.sh: No rule to make target 'upload'
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: pcap.h changed in devel/rawhide (fc6) ?
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• pcap.h changed in devel/rawhide (fc6) ?
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: Broken upgrade paths discussion
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: soname change policy proposal
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Broken upgrade paths discussion
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• FE Package Status of Jun 29, 2006
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Broken upgrade paths discussion
  • From: Paul Wouters
• My BZs
  • From: Paul
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-28
  • From: Jarod Wilson
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-28
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-28
  • From: Mike McGrath
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-28
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Looking for a host for a package under review
  • From: Chris Weyl
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-28
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-28
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: Looking for a host for a package under review
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Looking for a host for a package under review
  • From: Nikolai
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-28
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-28
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-28
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-28
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Taking over python-setuptools
  • From: Konstantin Ryabitsev
• Re: Mock and old distributions
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Mock and old distributions
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-28
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-28
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Mock and old distributions
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Importing Openbox with common/cvs-import.sh: No rule to make target 'upload'
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Importing Openbox with common/cvs-import.sh: No rule to make target 'upload'
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-27
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-27
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: AWOL owners and stale packages.
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• [solved] Re: Unorphaning Openbox: Commiting new stuff to multiple CVS branches properly?
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: soname change policy proposal
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: soname change policy proposal
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Testers with radeon 9600 or 9800 wanted for new 3D package
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: FYI: gaim-2.0.0 beta3 in FC6
  • From: Josh Boyer
• FYI: gaim-2.0.0 beta3 in FC6
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: Testers with radeon 9600 or 9800 wanted for new 3D package
  • From: dragoran
• Re: soname change policy proposal
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: soname change policy proposal
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Testers with radeon 9600 or 9800 wanted for new 3D package
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Testers with radeon 9600 or 9800 wanted for new 3D package
  • From: dragoran
• Re: %{_libexecdir}
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: soname change policy proposal
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: %{_libexecdir}
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: %{_libexecdir}
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: %{_libexecdir}
  • From: Laurent Rineau
• Re: %{_libexecdir}
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: soname change policy proposal
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: soname change policy proposal
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: %{_libexecdir}
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: soname change policy proposal
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Mock and old distributions
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Mock and old distributions
  • From: Paul Howarth
• %{_libexecdir}
  • From: Laurent Rineau
• Re: Unorphaning Openbox: Commiting new stuff to multiple CVS branches properly?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: soname change policy proposal
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Testers with radeon 9600 or 9800 wanted for new 3D package
  • From: Hans de Goede
• soname change policy proposal
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Unorphaning Openbox: Commiting new stuff to multiple CVS branches properly?
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: Testers with radeon 9600 or 9800 wanted for new 3D package
  • From: dragoran
• Re: Testers with radeon 9600 or 9800 wanted for new 3D package
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-26
  • From: Denis Leroy
• Re: AWOL owners and stale packages.
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• pam_mount
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-26
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-26
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-26
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-26
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-26
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-26
  • From: buildsys
• Re: knetworkmanager
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Mock and old distributions
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Mock and old distributions
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Testers with radeon 9600 or 9800 wanted for new 3D package
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: Testers with radeon 9600 or 9800 wanted for new 3D package
  • From: Dan Horák
• Testers with radeon 9600 or 9800 wanted for new 3D package
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Summary for the FESCo Meeting from June 22
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Summary for the FESCo Meeting from June 15
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Summary for the FESCo Meeting from June 08
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• onwers.list initial-CC list not working?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: AWOL owners and stale packages.
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: AWOL owners and stale packages.
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: AWOL owners and stale packages.
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-24
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-24
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-24
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-24
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-24
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Squeak License
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Squeak License
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• Re: Xfce 4.4beta1 test repo
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Xfce 4.4beta1 test repo (was Re: XFCE4.4)
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Xfce 4.4beta1 test repo (was Re: XFCE4.4)
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-23
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-23
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-23
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-23
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Time to make Extras multi-lib?
  • From: Jarod Wilson
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-22
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-22
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: Time to make Extras multi-lib?
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-22
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Time to make Extras multi-lib?
  • From: Jarod Wilson
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-22
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 22, 2006
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-22
  • From: Wart
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 22, 2006
  • From: Wart
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 22, 2006
  • From: Ian Pilcher
• Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-22
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-22
  • From: buildsys
• Re: new mock package
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Time to make Extras multi-lib?
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: new mock package
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Time to make Extras multi-lib?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Time to make Extras multi-lib?
  • From: Jarod Wilson
• Re: new mock package
  • From: Eric Tanguy
• Re: Time to make Extras multi-lib?
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: Time to make Extras multi-lib?
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• FE Package Status of Jun 22, 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: pkgconfig question
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: Fedora Extras Steering Committee (FESCo) Elections beginning on Thursday
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: Fedora Extras Steering Committee (FESCo) Elections beginning on Thursday
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: Time to make Extras multi-lib?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Time to make Extras multi-lib?
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: pkgconfig question
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Time to make Extras multi-lib?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: pkgconfig question
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: cpio: kdmtheme-1.1.2/src/<built-in>: No such file or directory
  • From: Chitlesh GOORAH
• Re: Time to make Extras multi-lib?
  • From: Gilboa Davara
• Re: Removing access for election nominees
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: New mock package coming out soon
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: New mock package coming out soon
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: Packing audacious - Funny plugins
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• pkgconfig question
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: new mock package
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: new mock package
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Packing audacious - Funny plugins
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Packing audacious - Funny plugins
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• new mock package
  • From: Eric Tanguy
• Re: Removing access for election nominees
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: mock is no longer working for me
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: mock is no longer working for me
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: mock is no longer working for me
  • From: seth vidal
• mock is no longer working for me
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Removing access for election nominees
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Removing access for election nominees
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Removing access for election nominees
  • From: Warren Togami
• Removing access for election nominees
  • From: Elliot Lee
• Re: cpio: kdmtheme-1.1.2/src/<built-in>: No such file or directory
  • From: Chitlesh GOORAH
• Re: Time to make Extras multi-lib?
  • From: Jarod Wilson
• Re: cpio: kdmtheme-1.1.2/src/<built-in>: No such file or directory
  • From: Chitlesh GOORAH
• Re: FE6 Buildsys Lockups
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Some problems to packaging a java app
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: cpio: kdmtheme-1.1.2/src/<built-in>: No such file or directory
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Time to make Extras multi-lib?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• cpio: kdmtheme-1.1.2/src/<built-in>: No such file or directory
  • From: Chitlesh GOORAH
• Re: debuginfo on PPC platform
  • From: Roland McGrath
• Re: Some problems to packaging a java app
  • From: alcapcom
• Re: Noob: Error tagging FC-5 branch
  • From: Ian Pilcher
• Re: Some problems to packaging a java app
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Some problems to packaging a java app
  • From: alcapcom
• Re: New mock package coming out soon
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Noob: Error tagging FC-5 branch
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: New mock package coming out soon
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Noob: Error tagging FC-5 branch
  • From: Ian Pilcher
• Re: FE6 Buildsys Lockups
  • From: Dan Williams
• Re: Time to make Extras multi-lib?
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: New mock package coming out soon
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: New mock package coming out soon
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Some problems to packaging a java app
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: FE6 Buildsys Lockups
  • From: Wart
• Time to make Extras multi-lib?
  • From: Jarod Wilson
• Some problems to packaging a java app
  • From: alcapcom
• Re: FE6 Buildsys Lockups
  • From: Dan Williams
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-21
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-21
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-21
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-21
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-21
  • From: buildsys
• debuginfo on PPC platform
  • From: Dawid Gajownik
• Re: rrdtool query
  • From: Lars E. Pettersson
• Re: FE6 Buildsys Lockups
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: Fedora Extras Steering Committee (FESCo) Elections beginning on Thursday
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• FE6 Buildsys Lockups
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: permissions on gdm session files
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: docs packaging
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: New mock package coming out soon
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: New mock package coming out soon
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: BuildSys Hosed?
  • From: Christopher Stone
• BuildSys Hosed?
  • From: Christopher Stone
• New mock package coming out soon
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: rrdtool query
  • From: Jarod Wilson
• Re: rrdtool query
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Packing audacious - Funny plugins
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-20
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-20
  • From: Matt Domsch
• rpmbuild and selinux
  • From: Eric Tanguy
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 18, 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: permissions on gdm session files
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 18, 2006
  • From: Denis Leroy
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Fedora Extras Steering Committee (FESCo) Elections beginning on Thursday
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Hugo Cisneiros
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Paul Howarth
• dbus-qt4 bindings
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: rpms/monodoc/devel monodoc.spec,1.3,1.4
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: rpms/monodoc/devel monodoc.spec,1.3,1.4
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Hugo Cisneiros
• Re: rpms/monodoc/devel monodoc.spec,1.3,1.4
  • From: PFJ
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Hugo Cisneiros
• Re: rpms/monodoc/devel monodoc.spec,1.3,1.4
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Hugo Cisneiros
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Fedora Extras Steering Committee (FESCo) Elections beginning on Thursday
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Fedora Extras Steering Committee (FESCo) Elections beginning on Thursday
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: rpms/monodoc/devel monodoc.spec,1.3,1.4
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: rpms/monodoc/devel monodoc.spec,1.3,1.4
  • From: PFJ
• Re: docs packaging
  • From: Eric TANGUY
• Re: rpms/monodoc/devel monodoc.spec,1.3,1.4
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: rpms/monodoc/devel monodoc.spec,1.3,1.4
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: docs packaging
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: docs packaging
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: docs packaging
  • From: Garrick Staples
• docs packaging
  • From: Eric Tanguy
• Re: %makeinstall vs DESTDIR (was: Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9)
  • From: John Dennis
• Re: %makeinstall vs DESTDIR (was: Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9)
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Hugo Cisneiros
• Re: permissions on gdm session files
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-19
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-19
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-18
  • From: Paul
• Re: Fedora Extras Steering Committee (FESCo) Elections beginning on Thursday
  • From: Elliot Lee
• FC4 minimal build root
  • From: Wart
• Re: A python GUI program - naming
  • From: Jeremy Sanders
• Re: A python GUI program - naming
  • From: Rex Dieter
• A python GUI program - naming
  • From: Jeremy Sanders
• Re: Fedora Extras Steering Committee (FESCo) Elections beginning on Thursday
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Packing audacious - Funny plugins
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Packing audacious - Funny plugins
  • From: Ralf Ertzinger
• Re: owners owners.list,1.1146,1.1147
  • From: Chris Chabot
• Re: owners owners.list,1.1146,1.1147
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: permissions on gdm session files
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Fedora Extras Steering Committee (FESCo) Elections beginning on Thursday
  • From: Mike McGrath
• %makeinstall vs DESTDIR (was: Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: locales
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: locales
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: locales
  • From: Wart
• permissions on gdm session files
  • From: Chris Ricker
• Re: why do we still ship (gtk1) xmms, when we have bmp
  • From: Ralf Ertzinger
• Re: [Fedora-livecd-list] Re: FE Package Status of Jun 18, 2006
  • From: Chitlesh GOORAH
• Re: [Fedora-livecd-list] Re: FE Package Status of Jun 18, 2006
  • From: Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-18
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: locales
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Thomas Vander Stichele
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-18
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-18
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-18
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-18
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-18
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-18
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-18
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Fedora Extras Steering Committee (FESCo) Elections beginning on Thursday
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: locales
  • From: Wart
• Re: locales
  • From: Paul
• locales
  • From: Wart
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-18
  • From: Paul
• Re: kadischi kadischi.spec,1.10,1.11
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-18
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-18
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-18
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: kadischi kadischi.spec,1.10,1.11
  • From: Chitlesh GOORAH
• Re: kadischi kadischi.spec,1.10,1.11
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: why do we still ship (gtk1) xmms, when we have bmp
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 18, 2006
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 18, 2006
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Fedora Extras Steering Committee (FESCo) Elections beginning on Thursday
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Fedora Extras Steering Committee (FESCo) Elections beginning on Thursday
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 18, 2006
  • From: Hugo Cisneiros
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-18
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-18
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: rrdtool query
  • From: Lars E. Pettersson
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-15
  • From: David Woodhouse
• Re: rrdtool query
  • From: Roy-Magne Mo
• Re: why do we still ship (gtk1) xmms, when we have bmp
  • From: Thomas Vander Stichele
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 18, 2006
  • From: Thomas Vander Stichele
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 18, 2006
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: why do we still ship (gtk1) xmms, when we have bmp
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 18, 2006
  • From: Chitlesh GOORAH
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 18, 2006
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Need help with upgrade path
  • From: Andreas Bierfert
• rrdtool query
  • From: Lars E. Pettersson
• Re: why do we still ship (gtk1) xmms, when we have bmp
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: why do we still ship (gtk1) xmms, when we have bmp
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: why do we still ship (gtk1) xmms, when we have bmp
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: why do we still ship (gtk1) xmms, when we have bmp
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: why do we still ship (gtk1) xmms, when we have bmp
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 18, 2006
  • From: Wart
• FE Package Status of Jun 18, 2006
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-17
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-17
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-17
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-17
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• why do we still ship (gtk1) xmms, when we have bmp
  • From: Hans de Goede
• KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora
  • From: Hugo Cisneiros
• Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-06-17
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-17
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in Fedora Extras 2006-06-16
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Request BUILDS: Job failed on arch i386
  • From: Chitlesh GOORAH
• Re: Request BUILDS: Job failed on arch i386
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Rick Muller
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in Fedora Extras 2006-06-16
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: mock build problem
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in Fedora Extras 2006-06-16
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Need help with upgrade path
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Request BUILDS: Job failed on arch i386
  • From: Chitlesh GOORAH
• Re: check-rpaths
  • From: Thomas Vander Stichele
• Re: Mock build problem
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: fstab-sync for xfce replacement package
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: tar issue: header keyword `SCHILY.fflags'
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• tar issue: header keyword `SCHILY.fflags'
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Mock build problem
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: Help name the test project!
  • From: Paul W. Frields
• mock build problem
  • From: Paul
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Jarod Wilson
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Jarod Wilson
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Paul
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Jose' Matos
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Jarod Wilson
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Jarod Wilson
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-16
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-16
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Axel Thimm
• [Bug 171039] Review Request: geos
  • From: bugzilla
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Rick Muller
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in Fedora Extras 2006-06-16
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-16
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-16
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-16
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-16
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Broken upgrade paths in Fedora Extras 2006-06-16
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Broken upgrade paths in Fedora Extras 2006-06-16
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-16
  • From: buildsys
• IMPORTANT: FE - ExcludeArch for noarch packages
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: FESCo Voting Application
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: FESCo Voting Application
  • From: Jima
• Re: FESCo Voting Application
  • From: Jima
• Re: Mock build problem
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: FESCo Voting Application
  • From: David Timms
• Re: Mock build problem
  • From: cranium2003
• Vacation 2006-06-17 - 2006-07-01
  • From: Nils Philippsen
• Re: Need help with upgrade path
  • From: Andreas Bierfert
• Re: Help name the test project!
  • From: David Howells
• Need help with upgrade path
  • From: Andreas Bierfert
• Re: FESCo Voting Application
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-15
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-15
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Re: Help name the test project!
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: FESCo Voting Application
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: FESCo Voting Application
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Help name the test project!
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Help name the test project!
  • From: Ian Chapman
• Re: Help name the test project!
  • From: Bob Relyea
• Help name the test project!
  • From: Will Woods
• Re: FESCo Voting Application
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: FESCo Voting Application
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: FESCo Voting Application
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• FESCo Voting Application
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Jarod Wilson
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Rick Muller
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: fstab-sync for xfce replacement package
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Rick Muller
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-15
  • From: Paul
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-15
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-15
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Who maintains python-numeric
  • From: Rick Muller
• Re: fstab-sync for xfce replacement package
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: fstab-sync for xfce replacement package
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Gnu Classpath
  • From: PFJ
• Re: Gnu Classpath
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Gnu Classpath
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Gnu Classpath
  • From: PFJ
• Re: rpms/texmaker/FC-5 texmaker.spec,1.7,1.8
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: rpms/texmaker/FC-5 texmaker.spec,1.7,1.8
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Mock build problem
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Packages up for adoption
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Mock build problem
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: Mock build problem
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Mock build problem
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: Mock build problem
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Mock build problem
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: Mock build problem
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Mock build problem
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: Mock build problem
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Mock build problem
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: Mock build problem
  • From: Paul Howarth
• orphan pre-announcement: Hermes
  • From: Thomas Vander Stichele
• Re: Mock build problem
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: Chicken & Egg Problem with FC4 "Minimal" Buildroot
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Mock build problem
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Mock build problem
  • From: cranium2003
• [Bug 166924] Review Request: scim-skk
  • From: bugzilla
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-14
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-14
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-14
  • From: Wart
• Re: build system issue
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: noarch when building packages
  • From: Christopher Stone
• noarch when building packages
  • From: Paul
• Re: Chicken & Egg Problem with FC4 "Minimal" Buildroot
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: Chicken & Egg Problem with FC4 "Minimal" Buildroot
  • From: Warren Togami
• Chicken & Egg Problem with FC4 "Minimal" Buildroot
  • From: Jeffrey C. Ollie
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-14
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-14
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: AWOL owners and stale packages.
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Packages up for adoption
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Packages up for adoption
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Packages up for adoption
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: Packages up for adoption
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Packages up for adoption
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: build system issue
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby immutable
  • From: Chris Weyl
• Re: build system issue
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: build system issue
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby immutable
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby immutable
  • From: Chris Weyl
• build system issue
  • From: Ian Chapman
• Re: fstab-sync for xfce replacement package
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• fstab-sync for xfce replacement package
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Some of my BZ packages have gone walkies!
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: Some of my BZ packages have gone walkies!
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Some of my BZ packages have gone walkies!
  • From: PFJ
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-14
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-14
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-14
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Broken upgrade paths in Fedora Extras 2006-06-14
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-14
  • From: buildsys
• Re: knetworkmanager
  • From: Stefan Neufeind
• Re: Packages up for adoption
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: Packages up for adoption
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Stuck Build Jobs
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: Stuck Build Jobs
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: Buildsys glitch?
  • From: Rick Stout
• Stuck Build Jobs
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: hammer3 stuck?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Packages up for adoption
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: anybody wanting to have a look at fcron review?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: anybody wanting to have a look at fcron review?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: hammer3 stuck?
  • From: Mike McGrath
• Re: rpms/knemo/devel knemo.spec,1.2,1.3
  • From: Rex Dieter
• anybody wanting to have a look at fcron review?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Buildsys glitch?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Buildsys glitch?
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: rpath joy
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-13
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-13
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-13
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-13
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Broken upgrade paths in Fedora Extras 2006-06-13
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-13
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Buildsys glitch?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• hammer3 stuck?
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: AWOL owners and stale packages.
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: rpath joy
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Buildsys job stuck
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby immutable
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Buildsys glitch?
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Buildsys glitch?
  • From: Rick Stout
• Re: how to patch configure.ac and not require autotools
  • From: Dan Horák
• kxdocker Orphaned
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 7, 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: failed mock build of gnubg on fc4
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 7, 2006
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-12
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Socks Proxy
  • From: Frank Büttner
• Re: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby immutable
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby immutable
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby immutable
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby immutable
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby immutable
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby immutable
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-12
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-12
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-12
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-12
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby immutable
  • From: seth vidal
• http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby immutable
  • From: David Lutterkort
• Broken upgrade paths in Fedora Extras 2006-06-12
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-12
  • From: buildsys
• Re: rpath joy
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Buildsys glitch?
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Buildsys glitch?
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 7, 2006
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 7, 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: Strange Build Failures
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Strange Build Failures
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-11
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-11
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-11
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: how to patch configure.ac and not require autotools
  • From: Wart
• Re: how to patch configure.ac and not require autotools
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: how to patch configure.ac and not require autotools
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: how to patch configure.ac and not require autotools
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: rpath joy
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: rpath joy
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: desktop-file-install problem
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• desktop-file-install problem
  • From: Paul
• Broken upgrade paths in Fedora Extras 2006-06-11
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Changing the default font in Fedora Core 6
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Changing the default font in Fedora Core 6
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: how to patch configure.ac and not require autotools
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: how to patch configure.ac and not require autotools
  • From: Wart
• Re: how to patch configure.ac and not require autotools
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: how to patch configure.ac and not require autotools
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: how to patch configure.ac and not require autotools
  • From: Wart
• Re: Comps Generation? [Was: Re: comps comps-fe5.xml,1.7,1.8]
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: Buildsys glitch? (perhaps primary.xml.gz problem)
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Changing the default font in Fedora Core 6
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Comps Generation? [Was: Re: comps comps-fe5.xml,1.7,1.8]
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: how to patch configure.ac and not require autotools
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: how to patch configure.ac and not require autotools
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: how to patch configure.ac and not require autotools
  • From: David Nečas (Yeti)
• Re: how to patch configure.ac and not require autotools
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-10
  • From: Paul Howarth
• how to patch configure.ac and not require autotools
  • From: Dan Horák
• failed mock build of gnubg on fc4
  • From: Joost Soeterbroek
• Re: rpath joy
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Buildsys glitch? (perhaps primary.xml.gz problem)
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• rpath joy
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Buildsys glitch? (perhaps primary.xml.gz problem)
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Buildsys glitch? (perhaps primary.xml.gz problem)
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Buildsys glitch? (perhaps primary.xml.gz problem)
  • From: TASAKA, Mamoru
• Re: Comps Generation? [Was: Re: comps comps-fe5.xml,1.7,1.8]
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Buildsys glitch? (perhaps primary.xml.gz problem)
  • From: TASAKA, Mamoru
• Re: Buildsys glitch? (perhaps primary.xml.gz problem)
  • From: Rick Stout
• Re: Buildsys glitch? (perhaps primary.xml.gz problem)
  • From: TASAKA, Mamoru