Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 13:29:31 +1200, Michael J. Knox wrote:
Owners file stats:
- 43 packages not available in extras devel or release
What is this based on?
The same script that was run last time. In fact, last run it was 51, so
we might need to check a bit closer whats happening here and ensure that
that number is indeed correct. This script is not perfect and with
packages moving to core from extras and from extras to core, we will see
some oddities.
The list contains many packages which are NOT included anymore on
purpose. Either obsoleted or not needed anymore (and mind you, we don't
have any meta package where to put global obsoletes forever). At least
these need not be put into this report:
[snip]
I can have these black listed.
wtogami at redhat dot com openoffice-extras
Files merged into Core package long ago.
will add to an exclude list.
davidhart at tqmcube dot com leafnode
Smells like a AWOL maintainer.
Shall it be orphaned then?
- 5 packages which have not yet been FE-APPROVE'd...
Openbox Peter Gordon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=165689,184080
A false positive? This is a resurrection attempt. owners.list only
contains the very old entry from fedora.us era.
Peter recently claimed ownership of this and it is going for a full review.
Thanks!
Michael
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
