Re: permissions on gdm session files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ville Skytt wrote:
> I'm pretty sure those are plain packaging bugs.
So we should report these as they are found to Bugzilla then?

> Based on a quick look into gdm sources, as expected, it doesn't care
> about the x bits but will just try to open those files for reading.
Excellent. I'll keep Openbox's without the x bit set.

> No it doesn't, the message id is just a bit misleading.  Use the -i or
> -I switches to rpmlint (see the man page) to get the explanation what it
> really thinks.
I've grown quite fond of rpmlint -i` while testing my built
binary/source RPMs. ;)

Thanks.

-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux