Fedora Extras

• Thread Index

• Re: Unorphan: Openbox
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: Unorphan: Openbox
  • From: Chris Ricker
• Re: Buildsys glitch?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: What's the best practice for packaging java apps on FC
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: What's the best practice for packaging java apps on FC
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Buildsys glitch?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-10
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-10
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-10
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-10
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-10
  • From: buildsys
• Comps Generation? [Was: Re: comps comps-fe5.xml,1.7,1.8]
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 7, 2006
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Buildsys glitch?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: nx requires and provides
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: nx requires and provides
  • From: David Nečas (Yeti)
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Andy Shevchenko
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: nx requires and provides
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Denis Leroy
• %find_lang vs. several lang packs
  • From: Andy Shevchenko
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Buildsys glitch?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: nx requires and provides
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Documentation packages in Package Naming Guidelines (and standards)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Documentation packages in Package Naming Guidelines (and standards)
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Retiring: R-gnomeGUI
  • From: Marc Schwartz
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Buildsys glitch?
  • From: TASAKA, Mamoru
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-09
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Retiring: R-gnomeGUI
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: nx requires and provides
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: nx requires and provides
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Buildsys glitch?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Buildsys glitch?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Buildsys glitch?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Denis Leroy
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Sharing sources in CVS
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Thoughts about courier-mta packaging?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: nx requires and provides
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: TASAKA, Mamoru
• [answered] Question about unorphaning Openbox [Was: "Re: Unorphan: Openbox"]
  • From: Peter Gordon
• nx requires and provides
  • From: Rick Stout
• Re: Unorphan: Openbox
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Unorphan: Openbox
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: David Timms
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Jose' Matos
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: AWOL owners and stale packages.
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: AWOL owners and stale packages.
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-08
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: rpms/poker-eval/FC-4 poker-eval.spec,1.8,1.9
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Sharing sources in CVS
  • From: Jeffrey C. Ollie
• Documentation packages in Package Naming Guidelines (and standards)
  • From: Hugo Cisneiros
• Sharing sources in CVS
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: change to owners.list
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: Thoughts about courier-mta packaging?
  • From: Chris Petersen
• Re: change to owners.list
  • From: Michael J Knox
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-09
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-09
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-09
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-09
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-09
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Test Project
  • From: Will Woods
• Re: Suggestion for package: makejail
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Thoughts about courier-mta packaging?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Suggestion for package: makejail
  • From: Stefan Neufeind
• Re: do we need a PackageMaintainGuide? (was "Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-09)
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-09
  • From: Jose' Matos
• do we need a PackageMaintainGuide? (was "Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-09)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Security Patch in netpanzer (question)
  • From: Hugo Cisneiros
• Re: Security Patch in netpanzer (question)
  • From: Hugo Cisneiros
• Re: Extras build failures...
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-09
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• RELEASE: Mach 0.9.0 'Cambria'
  • From: thomas
• Re: Extras build failures...
  • From: Dan Williams
• Re: Retiring: R-gnomeGUI
  • From: Marc Schwartz
• Re: Extras build failures...
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Extras build failures...
  • From: David Woodhouse
• Re: prevent to build packae for ppc
  • From: Frank Büttner
• Re: prevent to build packae for ppc
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-09
  • From: Paul F. Johnson
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-09
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-09
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-09
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-09
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: prevent to build packae for ppc
  • From: Frank Büttner
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-09
  • From: buildsys
• Re: change to owners.list
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-09
  • From: buildsys
• Re: prevent to build packae for ppc
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: prevent to build packae for ppc
  • From: Frank Büttner
• Re: Security Patch in netpanzer (question)
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: prevent to build packae for ppc
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Retiring: R-gnomeGUI
  • From: Jose' Matos
• change to owners.list
  • From: Michael J Knox
• Re: Thoughts about courier-mta packaging?
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: Security Patch in netpanzer (question)
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: prevent to build packae for ppc
  • From: David Woodhouse
• Re: nx, freenx on x86_64
  • From: David Woodhouse
• Security Patch in netpanzer (question)
  • From: Hugo Cisneiros
• Re: Retiring: R-gnomeGUI
  • From: Marc Schwartz
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-08
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-08
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-08
  • From: buildsys
• Re: nagios-plugins FC-3 branch request
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Retiring: R-gnomeGUI
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Thoughts about courier-mta packaging?
  • From: Chris Petersen
• Re: rpms/wmx/FC-4 wmx.spec,1.7,1.8
  • From: Gabriel L. Somlo
• Re: taking over tripwire?
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• tinderbox.
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• nagios-plugins FC-3 branch request
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: nx, freenx on x86_64
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: nx, freenx on x86_64
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: AWOL owners and stale packages.
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: prevent to build packae for ppc
  • From: Frank Büttner
• Re: prevent to build packae for ppc
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-08
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: nx, freenx on x86_64
  • From: Rick Stout
• Re: libdir and python on x86_64
  • From: Thomas Vander Stichele
• Re: libdir and python on x86_64
  • From: Thomas Vander Stichele
• Re: prevent to build packae for ppc
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• prevent to build packae for ppc
  • From: Frank Büttner
• Re: Mono Packaging (was Re: On the subject of sponsors...)
  • From: Brian Pepple
• Re: rpms/wmx/FC-4 wmx.spec,1.7,1.8
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: rpms/wmx/FC-4 wmx.spec,1.7,1.8
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Mono Packaging (was Re: On the subject of sponsors...)
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: nx, freenx on x86_64
  • From: Neal Becker
• When package review is finalised - add link to viewcvs ?
  • From: David Timms
• Re: nx, freenx on x86_64
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: MLton (SML compiler) bootstrapping
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• nx, freenx on x86_64
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: libdir and python on x86_64
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: On the subject of sponsors...
  • From: Brian Pepple
• Re: libdir and python on x86_64
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: Extras build failures...
  • From: Dan Williams
• Re: knetworkmanager
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-08
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-08
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-08
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-08
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: On the subject of sponsors...
  • From: PFJ
• Amaya
  • From: PFJ
• Re: On the subject of sponsors...
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-08
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Extras build failures...
  • From: David Woodhouse
• Re: libdir and python on x86_64
  • From: Thomas Vander Stichele
• Re: On the subject of sponsors...
  • From: PFJ
• Re: On the subject of sponsors...
  • From: Paul Howarth
• On the subject of sponsors...
  • From: PFJ
• Re: MLton (SML compiler) bootstrapping
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• Re: taking over tripwire?
  • From: dwight at supercomputer.org
• plib changes heads up
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: AWOL owners and stale packages.
  • From: Paul
• Re: MLton (SML compiler) bootstrapping
  • From: Adam Goode
• Re: MLton (SML compiler) bootstrapping
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: AWOL owners and stale packages.
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Extras build failures...
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: knetworkmanager
  • From: Stefan Neufeind
• Re: FE package database
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Extras build failures...
  • From: David Woodhouse
• Re: FE package database
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: rpath fails rpmbuild
  • From: Chitlesh GOORAH
• Re: taking over tripwire?
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: FE package database
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: taking over tripwire?
  • From: dwight at supercomputer.org
• Re: FE package database
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: taking over tripwire?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: rpmlint warnings/errors
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: FE package database
  • From: Warren Togami
• MLton (SML compiler) bootstrapping
  • From: Adam Goode
• taking over tripwire?
  • From: dwight at supercomputer.org
• Re: FE package database
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: rpmlint warnings/errors
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: rpmlint warnings/errors
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: FE package database
  • From: Chris Weyl
• Re: FE package database
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Binaries in /usr/share
  • From: Paul
• Re: Binaries in /usr/share
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: FE package database
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Binaries in /usr/share
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: libdir and python on x86_64
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Hula -- mixed mono package
  • From: PFJ
• Re: Hula -- mixed mono package
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Hula -- mixed mono package
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: rpmlint warnings/errors
  • From: Kent E Yoder
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 7, 2006
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Binaries in /usr/share
  • From: PFJ
• Re: Binaries in /usr/share
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: rpmlint warnings/errors
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Buildsys strangeness
  • From: Dan Williams
• Re: rpmlint warnings/errors
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Binaries in /usr/share
  • From: PFJ
• Re: Binaries in /usr/share
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Binaries in /usr/share
  • From: PFJ
• Re: Attn. FESCo: gdal package review deadlocked
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Attn. FESCo: gdal package review deadlocked
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: rpmlint warnings/errors
  • From: Daniel H Jones
• Attn. FESCo: gdal package review deadlocked
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: libdir and python on x86_64
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: Buildsys strangeness
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 7, 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: What's the best practice for packaging java apps on FC
  • From: alcapcom
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Buildsys strangeness
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: libdir and python on x86_64
  • From: Thomas Vander Stichele
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 7, 2006
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 7, 2006
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 7, 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 7, 2006
  • From: Hans de Goede
• FE package database
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: Hula -- mixed mono package
  • From: PFJ
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 7, 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: Hula -- mixed mono package
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: What's the best practice for packaging java apps on FC
  • From: Andrew Overholt
• Re: FE Package Status of Jun 7, 2006
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: mock problem
  • From: Gabriel L. Somlo
• Re: Reverting package to a previous
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• Re: Need Help from a C expert
  • From: Ralf Ertzinger
• FE Package Status of Jun 7, 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: Need Help from a C expert
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: mock problem
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: What's the best practice for packaging java apps on FC
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Reverting package to a previous
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Reverting package to a previous
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• mock problem
  • From: Paul
• Re: Running rpm inside mock's chroot
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Reverting package to a previous
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Running rpm inside mock's chroot
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Reverting package to a previous
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• Re: Hula -- mixed mono package
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Reverting package to a previous
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Reverting package to a previous
  • From: Ian Pilcher
• Re: Reverting package to a previous
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• Re: Hula -- mixed mono package
  • From: Paul
• Re: Hula -- mixed mono package
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Reverting package to a previous
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Hula -- mixed mono package
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Reverting package to a previous
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Reverting package to a previous
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• Re: Reverting package to a previous
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Hula -- mixed mono package
  • From: Paul
• Re: Hula -- mixed mono package
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Reverting package to a previous
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Hula -- mixed mono package
  • From: Paul
• Re: Hula -- mixed mono package
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Reverting package to a previous
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• Re: Hula -- mixed mono package
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Hula -- mixed mono package
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Hula -- mixed mono package
  • From: Paul
• Re: rpmlint warnings/errors
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• rpmlint warnings/errors
  • From: Daniel H Jones
• Hula -- mixed mono package
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: cranium2003
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-06
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-06
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-06
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-06
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: cranium2003
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-06
  • From: buildsys
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: amaya orphaned?
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Re: amaya orphaned?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-05
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-05
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: amaya orphaned?
  • From: Paul
• Re: amaya orphaned?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Unorphan question
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• amaya orphaned?
  • From: Paul
• Re: Unorphan question
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Unorphan question
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: extras buildsys/plague downtime
  • From: seth vidal
• new wiki-page: Packaging/FrequentlyMadeMistakes
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: rpmlint non executable script
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-04
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: David Timms
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: David Timms
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: David Timms
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: unable to use mock
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-04
  • From: seth vidal
• unable to use mock
  • From: cranium2003
• Re: 'CVS sync need' proposition
  • From: Paul Howarth
• 'CVS sync need' proposition
  • From: Andy Shevchenko
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-04
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-04
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-04
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-04
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: Need Help from a C expert
  • From: Andy Shevchenko
• Re: Pre-orphaning annoucement for glabels and istanbul, looking for a new maintainer for both
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: Build system problems for x86_64 in development
  • From: Dennis Gregorovic
• Re: Build system problems for x86_64 in development
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Build system problems for x86_64 in development
  • From: Jose' Matos
• Re: Need Help from a C expert
  • From: Christopher Stone
• rpmlint non executable script
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Need Help from a C expert
  • From: Christopher Stone
• extras buildsys/plague downtime
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: remove rpmlint no-documentation warning on -devel subpackages?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: remove rpmlint no-documentation warning on -devel subpackages?
  • From: Ian Chapman
• Re: remove rpmlint no-documentation warning on -devel subpackages?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: remove rpmlint no-documentation warning on -devel subpackages?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: remove rpmlint no-documentation warning on -devel subpackages?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: kmod template?
  • From: Sean Bruno
• Re: remove rpmlint no-documentation warning on -devel subpackages?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: rpath fails rpmbuild
  • From: Ian Chapman
• rpath fails rpmbuild
  • From: Chitlesh GOORAH
• Re: remove rpmlint no-documentation warning on -devel subpackages?
  • From: Ian Chapman
• Re: remove rpmlint no-documentation warning on -devel subpackages?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: What's the best practice for packaging java apps on FC
  • From: alcapcom
• Re: What's the best practice for packaging java apps on FC
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• What's the best practice for packaging java apps on FC
  • From: alcapcom
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-04
  • From: buildsys
• Re: kmod template?
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: desktop-file-install problem
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: desktop-file-install problem
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: desktop-file-install problem
  • From: Paul
• Re: desktop-file-install problem
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: remove rpmlint no-documentation warning on -devel subpackages?
  • From: Christopher Stone
• remove rpmlint no-documentation warning on -devel subpackages?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: desktop-file-install problem
  • From: Rex Dieter
• desktop-file-install problem
  • From: Paul
• Re: Summary from this weeks FESCo Meeting
  • From: Michael J Knox
• Re: rpmlint no-soname warning
  • From: Ian Chapman
• Re: rpmlint no-soname warning
  • From: Ian Chapman
• kmod template?
  • From: Sean Bruno
• Re: Not come across this one - any advice?
  • From: Ian Chapman
• rpmlint no-soname warning
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Summary from this weeks FESCo Meeting
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Not come across this one - any advice?
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Not come across this one - any advice?
  • From: Paul
• [Bug 171915] Review Request: texmaker - LaTeX editor
  • From: bugzilla
• Re: require foo or bar?
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: require foo or bar?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: segmentation fault on buildsystem
  • From: Andy Shevchenko
• Re: require foo or bar?
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• require foo or bar?
  • From: Christoph Wickert
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-02
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-02
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: segmentation fault on buildsystem
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: segmentation fault on buildsystem
  • From: Rex Dieter
• segmentation fault on buildsystem
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• new and updated plugins: lineak (claiming ownership of finally-complete package set)
  • From: Chris Petersen
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-02
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-02
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• Re: 2nd Fedora Extras Review Day - 2006-03-05 (sunday)
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: 2nd Fedora Extras Review Day - 2006-03-05 (sunday)
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Mock Problems with OpenSceneGraph Package
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-02
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-06-02
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: install-info question
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Mock Problems with OpenSceneGraph Package
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Mock Problems with OpenSceneGraph Package
  • From: Wart
• Re: Mock Problems with OpenSceneGraph Package
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Mock Problems with OpenSceneGraph Package
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-02
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-02
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-02
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-02
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-02
  • From: buildsys
• Test push coming -- Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-02
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• install-info question
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Help - any got some spare ftp space?
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-02
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-02
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-02
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-02
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-02
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-05-31
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Broken packages
  • From: TASAKA, Mamoru
• Re: Building wine on x86_64
  • From: Jay Bloodworth
• Re: Broken packages
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: status of "freenx" in Extras
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Broken packages
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Broken packages
  • From: Steven Pritchard
• Re: Broken packages
  • From: PFJ
• Re: Broken packages
  • From: Steven Pritchard
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-05-31
  • From: dragoran
• Broken packages
  • From: PFJ
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-31
  • From: David Woodhouse
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-31
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-31
  • From: David Woodhouse
• Help - any got some spare ftp space?
  • From: PFJ
• Re: Building wine on x86_64
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Building wine on x86_64
  • From: Jay Bloodworth
• Re: bug with `make tag`
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: bug with `make tag`
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: bug with `make tag`
  • From: Rex Dieter
• bug with `make tag`
  • From: Chris Petersen
• gnome-yum soon to be orphaned
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-06-01
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-06-01
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-06-01
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-06-01
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-06-01
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Packaging Jython and its dependencies for Extras
  • From: Igor Foox
• Re: MySQL user install possible?
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Packaging Jython and its dependencies for Extras
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Packaging Jython and its dependencies for Extras
  • From: Michael J Knox
• Packaging Jython and its dependencies for Extras
  • From: Igor Foox
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: status of "freenx" in Extras
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: seth vidal
• status of "freenx" in Extras
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Will take Hula (was Re: Hula history?)
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Jose' Matos
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Konstantin Ryabitsev
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Konstantin Ryabitsev
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Paul P Komkoff Jr
• Re: Hula history?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Monodevelop etc into FE
  • From: PFJ
• Re: devel: "Require %{name} = %{version}-%{release}"?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Newer versions of mono for extras
  • From: PFJ
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: devel: "Require %{name} = %{version}-%{release}"?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: devel: "Require %{name} = %{version}-%{release}"?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Newer versions of mono for extras
  • From: dragoran
• Re: Newer versions of mono for extras
  • From: PFJ
• Re: Newer versions of mono for extras
  • From: dragoran
• Newer versions of mono for extras
  • From: PFJ
• Hula history?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• devel: "Require %{name} = %{version}-%{release}"?
  • From: Laurent Rineau
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Sander Hoentjen
• Re: FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected (was Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-31 #2
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-31 #2
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: CVS branching
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-31
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-31
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-31
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-31
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-31
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-31
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-31
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-31
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-31
  • From: Matt Domsch
• [Bug 171915] Review Request: texmaker - LaTeX editor
  • From: bugzilla
• Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• CVS branching
  • From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-31
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-31
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-31
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-31
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: (Small) software that needs code audit
  • From: Wart
• [Bug 171915] Review Request: texmaker - LaTeX editor
  • From: bugzilla
• Re: MySQL user install possible?
  • From: Roozbeh Pournader
• [Bug 171915] Review Request: texmaker - LaTeX editor
  • From: bugzilla
• Re: Buildsys (i386) oddity
  • From: Dan Williams
• Syncronisation failure - Tracing problem
  • From: Edward Grace
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-31
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-31
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-31
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-05-31
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-05-31
  • From: buildsys
• Unison fails to syncronise between Fedora Core 5 and Intel OS X - Bugzilla bug #191295
  • From: Edward Grace
• Re: buidsys hangs ?
  • From: TASAKA, Mamoru
• MySQL user install possible?
  • From: Christopher Stone
• buidsys hangs ?
  • From: Eric Tanguy
• Re: package signing
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: (Small) software that needs code audit
  • From: Ralf Ertzinger
• Re: package signing
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: (Small) software that needs code audit
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: package signing
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• package signing
  • From: Frank Büttner
• Re: (Small) software that needs code audit
  • From: Josh Bressers
• (Small) software that needs code audit
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Buildsys (i386) oddity
  • From: Hugo Cisneiros
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-29
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-29
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-05-29
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-29
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-05-29
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-27
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: knetworkmanager
  • From: Phil Baltar
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-05-27
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-27
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-27
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Buildsys (i386) oddity + segmentation fault
  • From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
• Re: Buildsys (i386) oddity
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: knetworkmanager
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Need CVS access
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Need CVS access
  • From: Parag N(पराग़)
• Re: knetworkmanager
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• knetworkmanager
  • From: Phil Baltar
• Re: FE-devel buildsys complaints about repomd.xml [SOLVED]
  • From: TASAKA, Mamoru
• Re: Maintainer sought for lirc-kmod(-common)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Maintainer sought for lirc-kmod(-common)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Maintainer sought for lirc-kmod(-common)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: FE-devel buildsys complaints about repomd.xml
  • From: TASAKA, Mamoru
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Re: cvs-import problems
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: How to build jack-audio-connection kit?
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• cvs-import problems
  • From: Andrea Veri
• Re: Upstream changing Licenses [Was: perl-Locale-Maketext-Simple.spec]
  • From: Steven Pritchard
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-05-27
  • From: Steven Pritchard
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-27
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-27
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-27
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-05-27
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Fedora Extras packages with broken upgrade paths
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Fedora Extras packages with broken upgrade paths
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-05-27
  • From: buildsys
• FE-devel buildsys complaints about repomd.xml
  • From: TASAKA, Mamoru
• Re: Fedora logo license
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Re: Fedora logo license
  • From: Patrick W. Barnes
• Re: Fedora logo license
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora logo license
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Re: Fedora logo license
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: How to build jack-audio-connection kit?
  • From: Andy Shevchenko
• Re: orphaned perl modules - perl-XML-Simple
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Re: Naming guidelines question
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Re: Fedora logo license
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Upstream changing Licenses [Was: perl-Locale-Maketext-Simple.spec]
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: David Timms
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: David Timms
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: David Timms
• Re: orphaned perl modules - perl-XML-Simple
  • From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
• Re: orphaned perl modules - perl-XML-Simple
  • From: Michael J Knox
• Re: orphaned perl modules - perl-XML-Simple
  • From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
• Re: orphaned perl modules - perl-XML-Simple
  • From: Michael J Knox
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Chris Petersen
• Re: orphaned perl modules - perl-XML-Simple
  • From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Paul W. Frields
• orphaned perl modules
  • From: Michael J Knox
• Re: Naming guidelines question
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: PHP packaging guidelines
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: man-pages-XX package naming
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Naming guidelines question
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: How to build jack-audio-connection kit?
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: PHP packaging guidelines
  • From: Remi Collet
• Fedora logo license
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Naming guidelines question
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Naming guidelines question
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Naming guidelines question
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• man-pages-XX package naming
  • From: Andy Shevchenko
• How to build jack-audio-connection kit?
  • From: Andy Shevchenko
• Re: Naming guidelines question
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Naming guidelines question
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: PHP packaging guidelines
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Naming guidelines question
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: Naming guidelines question
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Re: Naming guidelines question
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Naming guidelines question
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Naming guidelines question
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Tom Diehl
• Re: Naming guidelines question
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Re: Naming guidelines question
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Naming guidelines question
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: Buildsys (i386) oddity + segmentation fault
  • From: Dan Williams
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: Buildsys (i386) oddity + segmentation fault
  • From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
• Re: PHP packaging guidelines
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-26
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-05-26
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-26
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-26
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-05-26
  • From: buildsys
• Re: PHP packaging guidelines
  • From: Andreas Thienemann
• Re: PHP packaging guidelines
  • From: Andreas Thienemann
• Re: PHP packaging guidelines
  • From: Andreas Thienemann
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Re: PHP packaging guidelines
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: PHP packaging guidelines
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: PHP packaging guidelines
  • From: Mike McGrath
• PHP packaging guidelines
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: check-rpaths
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: Axel Thimm
• OT: Media format patents and commercial installations
  • From: David Timms
• Re: mock and build system macros
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: mock and build system macros
  • From: Callum Lerwick