Hi,
> I'm working on updating the hula spec to the latest version and found
> that some of the programs within hula now depend on mono. The install
> currently puts the mono packages in /usr/lib/hula and the normal
> binaries and libs into %{_libdir} which appears to be the expected
> outcome. However, it has a helper application hulamonohelper that drops
> privileges from the server before invoking the mono applications. This
> is installed in /usr/lib/hula rather than %{_libdir}/hula or
> %{_libexecdir}/hula. Should I change this or is it actually an
> allowable practice for mono apps?
Add to the top of the spec
%define _libdir %{_exec_prefix}/lib
compile and be happy - mono is a strange beast, accept where it goes and
when you use rpmlint, you can ignore quite a lot of the errors as
rpmlint doesn't understand mono and it's packaging.
TTFN
Paul
--
ich liebe Ashleigh, eins zwei drei
ich liebe Ashleigh, auf meinem Knee zu hüpfen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
