>>>>> "DHJ" == Daniel H Jones <Daniel> writes: DHJ> Is it sufficient to provide some explanation of the warning when DHJ> a package is submitted? It would help the reviewer if you did so. DHJ> I have not found a list of acceptable/unacceptable rpmlint DHJ> issues. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/CommonRpmlintIssues (just getting started). You're free to add things there. Make sure you run "rpmlint -i" if you just need additional information about what rpmlint is complaining about. DHJ> W: opencryptoki devel-file-in-non-devel-package DHJ> /usr/lib/libopencryptoki.so Do you have a versioned .so file there as well (i.e. libopencryptoki.so.1.2)? If so, this is a blocker. DHJ> E: opencryptoki non-standard-gid DHJ> /var/lib/opencryptoki pkcs11 Not a blocker, assuming you properly create that user. DHJ> W: opencryptoki DHJ> service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/pkcsslotd This is a blocker. Packages should not install services which are turned on by default; otherwise, someone who installs a bunch of packages ends up with a bunch of enabled services. (Imagine the theoretical "Everything" install.) DHJ> W: opencryptoki incoherent-init-script-name pkcsslotd It helps if the init file is named in such a way that it is associated with the package, but this is not always reasonable. - J< -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
