On 6/7/06, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 07.06.2006, 10:05 +0200 schrieb Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx: > Package table: > > 1. product > 2. component > 3. description > 4. initialowner (current package owner) > 5. initialqacontact > 6. initialcclist (package co-maintainers) If'd prefer a solution where the initial owner (and maybe the initialcc list, too) could be repo-dependent. E.g. "foo" maintains "bar" for FC5 and devel, "baz" maintains it for FE4 and FE3 and also has "foo" in the initialcclist.
So here's a couple thoughts -- it would have taken more time to type it out than to show the table relationship in dia, so here goes: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/fedora_package_db.dia And yes, it's just a sketch :) It also comes to mind, do we have actual requirements for what we want this database to be able to do? e.g. just track packages & owners, include builddeps, etc, etc? -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
