Am Mittwoch, den 07.06.2006, 10:05 +0200 schrieb Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx: > Package table: > > 1. product > 2. component > 3. description > 4. initialowner (current package owner) > 5. initialqacontact > 6. initialcclist (package co-maintainers) If'd prefer a solution where the initial owner (and maybe the initialcc list, too) could be repo-dependent. E.g. "foo" maintains "bar" for FC5 and devel, "baz" maintains it for FE4 and FE3 and also has "foo" in the initialcclist. > 7. review submitter > 8. review submit date > 9. reviewer > 10. accept date Are those really that important? Wouldn't the Bugzilla-ID suffice here? > 11. review request BZ ticket number > 12. current status (Active, Orphaned, Dropped, Moved to Core) > [...] CU thl -- Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
