Re: Summary from last weeks FESCo meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 20:49 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Ohh, sorry, yes, that was a bit misleading. The problem simply is: who
> checks that the md5 sums stored in CVS are fine / those from upstream?
> Nobody. I can upload a new version of package "foo" at any time and
> include a rootkit in the tarball I upload. No one would notice.

Any new entries to the lookaside cache should be logged to the commits
list. (Are they already?) Any direct uploads not being grabbed directly
from upstream should be watched particularly closely.

This is a social problem. Looking for a technical solution to a social
problem is barking up the wrong tree. The solution is to ensure reliable
accounting is available for the community to monitor.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux