On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 15:18 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "GM" == Gérard Milmeister <gemi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> GM> In fact, I already waited some time, but finally felt, that I
> GM> could not leave the situation as it is.
>
> Then there is another possibility. Keep the regular erlang packages
> as is and release "erlangR10B" packages. The update wings3d and
> erlang_sdl and any other packages that rely on the old erlang version
> to depend (and link against) on this new package.
That would make sense, since it seems that there are really incompatible
changes between R10B and R11B. Does this mean that a completely new
package has to be imported into CVS?
Almost all files reside in %{_libdir}/erlang. Without patching one
could use then ${_libdir}/erlang10B/erlang. Using simply
%{_libdir}/erlang10B is probably more difficult, since this would entail
some patching.
--
Gérard Milmeister
Langackerstrasse 49
CH-8057 Zürich
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
