On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 22:37 +0200, Gérard Milmeister wrote: > On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 15:18 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > > > Then there is another possibility. Keep the regular erlang packages > > as is and release "erlangR10B" packages. The update wings3d and > > erlang_sdl and any other packages that rely on the old erlang version > > to depend (and link against) on this new package. > > That would make sense, There's also a precedent of naming stuff like this as compat-foo, and I think it's generally preferred over version based suffixing nowadays, at least when there's no intention to keep permanently shipping many versions of something. > since it seems that there are really incompatible > changes between R10B and R11B. Yet another case to the pile of recent incompatible upgrades :( -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
