Fedora Extras

• Thread Index

• Re: mock and build system macros
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: mock and build system macros
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Buildsys (i386) oddity
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: mock and build system macros
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: mock and build system macros
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: check-rpaths
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: mock and build system macros
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: mock and build system macros
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: mock and build system macros
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: mock and build system macros
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: FE 5 Amarok
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Re: FE 5 Amarok
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Re: mock and build system macros
  • From: David Lutterkort
• mock and build system macros
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: check-rpaths
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: FE 5 Amarok
  • From: Quentin Spencer
• Re: build system issue?
  • From: Dan Williams
• FE 5 Amarok
  • From: Sean Bruno
• build system issue?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Question about "shlib-with-non-pic-code", possibly caused by assembler code?
  • From: Roland McGrath
• Building system: segmentation fault in devel (i386 arch)
  • From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
• Re: Question about "shlib-with-non-pic-code", possibly caused by assembler code?
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• Re: Question about "shlib-with-non-pic-code", possibly caused by assembler code?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Question about "shlib-with-non-pic-code", possibly caused by assembler code?
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-05-24
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-24
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-24
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-24
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Question about "shlib-with-non-pic-code", possibly caused by assembler code?
  • From: Roland McGrath
• Question about "shlib-with-non-pic-code", possibly caused by assembler code?
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: check-rpaths
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Obsoletes in a spec file
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: mock build - need help
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Obsoletes in a spec file
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Obsoletes in a spec file
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Obsoletes in a spec file
  • From: Paul
• Re: mock build - need help
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• new package: lineak-defaultplugin
  • From: Chris Petersen
• Re: check-rpaths
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: mock build - need help
  • From: John Berninger
• Re: Changing subpackaging
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: mock build - need help
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: check-rpaths
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Obsoletes in a spec file
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• check-rpaths
  • From: Paul
• Obsoletes in a spec file
  • From: Paul
• Re: Gettext and %find_lang
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• mock build - need help
  • From: John Berninger
• Re: Changing subpackaging
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Changing subpackaging
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Changing subpackaging
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Changing subpackaging
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-23
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-05-23
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-23
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-23
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Gettext and %find_lang
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: twisted 2.x packaging
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Gettext and %find_lang
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• twisted 2.x packaging
  • From: Thomas Vander Stichele
• Re: Gettext and %find_lang
  • From: Brian Pepple
• Re: Gettext and %find_lang
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Re: Gettext and %find_lang
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Old broken packages
  • From: Shahms King
• Re: Gettext and %find_lang
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Old broken packages
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Old broken packages
  • From: Shahms King
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Konstantin Ryabitsev
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Gettext and %find_lang
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Quentin Spencer
• Re: rpms/apt/FC-4 apt.spec,1.18,1.19
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Luvna (Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?)
  • From: Andreas Thienemann
• Three staged repo structure, official/unofficial/outcast (was: Luvna (Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?))
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Gettext and %find_lang
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Old broken packages
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: rpms/apt/FC-4 apt.spec,1.18,1.19
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Luvna (Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Tim Fenn
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-22
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Old broken packages
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-05-22
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: Updates to Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Tim Fenn
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Tim Fenn
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Updates to Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Subpackages should own directories too?
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Subpackages should own directories too?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Subpackages should own directories too?
  • From: Laurent Rineau
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-22
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-22
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-05-22
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-22
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• scientific license - fedora compatible?
  • From: Tim Fenn
• [Fwd: Re: Pre-orphaning annoucement for glabels and istanbul, looking for a new maintainer for both]
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Old broken packages
  • From: Shahms King
• Re: Updates to Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Updates to Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Updates to Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Updates to Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Updates to Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Updates to Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Updates to Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Pre-orphaning annoucement for glabels and istanbul, looking for a new maintainer for both
  • From: Thomas Vander Stichele
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-21
  • From: Thomas Vander Stichele
• Pre-orphaning annoucement for glabels and istanbul, looking for a new maintainer for both
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• taking over perl-XML-XPath
  • From: Chris Weyl
• Unorphan cksfv
  • From: Christopher Stone
• claiming ownership of new package: lineakd
  • From: Chris Petersen
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-21
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-21
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-21
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-05-21
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Summary from this weeks FESCo meeting
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: dealing with "contrib" type directories
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• dealing with "contrib" type directories
  • From: Chris Petersen
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Taking ownership of yakuake
  • From: Chitlesh GOORAH
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Taking ownership of yakuake
  • From: Dawid Gajownik
• [Bug 174325] Review Request: mod_spin Apache module
  • From: bugzilla
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Jens Liebchen
• Re: Taking ownership of yakuake
  • From: Hugo Cisneiros
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Linus Walleij
• Re: Taking ownership of yakuake
  • From: Dawid Gajownik
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Jens Liebchen
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-20
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-20
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-05-20
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-20
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Jens Liebchen
• Re: Taking ownership of yakuake
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Taking ownership of yakuake
  • From: Dawid Gajownik
• Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Taking ownership of yakuake
  • From: Chitlesh GOORAH
• Re: Taking ownership of yakuake
  • From: Hugo Cisneiros
• Taking ownership of yakuake
  • From: Dawid Gajownik
• Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Trouble with the new Amarok version
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• claiming ownership of rsnapshot
  • From: Chris Petersen
• taking owership..
  • From: Michael J Knox
• Re: Thoughts about courier-mta packaging?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Thoughts about courier-mta packaging?
  • From: Chris Petersen
• Re: unifying of spec files for different Fedora releases
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: unifying of spec files for different Fedora releases
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: unifying of spec files for different Fedora releases
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: unifying of spec files for different Fedora releases
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Taking Ownership of perl-Net-Netmask
  • From: Warren Togami
• [Bug 166960] Review Request: Fuse-emulator
  • From: bugzilla
• Re: FE Package Status of May 19, 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: FE Package Status of May 19, 2006
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• mock and proxy
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: FE Package Status of May 19, 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: FE Package Status of May 19, 2006
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: FE Package Status of May 19, 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: FE Package Status of May 19, 2006
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: FE Package Status of May 12, 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: FE Package Status of May 12, 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: unifying of spec files for different Fedora releases
  • From: Dan Horák
• FE Package Status of May 19, 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-19
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-05-19
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-19
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-19
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Re: unifying of spec files for different Fedora releases
  • From: Jose' Matos
• Re: unifying of spec files for different Fedora releases
  • From: Nils Philippsen
• Re: unifying of spec files for different Fedora releases
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: unifying of spec files for different Fedora releases
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-18
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• unifying of spec files for different Fedora releases
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: GNOME packages that need review?
  • From: Rick L Vinyard Jr
• Re: Virtuals for webserver and fastcgi
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-18
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Removing noise from specs
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Removing noise from specs
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Incoming: directfb soname problems
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Virtuals for webserver and fastcgi
  • From: Andreas Thienemann
• Re: Virtuals for webserver and fastcgi
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Virtuals for webserver and fastcgi
  • From: Quentin Spencer
• Re: Virtuals for webserver and fastcgi
  • From: Andreas Thienemann
• Re: Greedy install
  • From: Dan
• Re: Greedy install
  • From: Dan
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-18
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-05-18
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-18
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-18
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Removing noise from specs
  • From: Jima
• Re: Incoming: directfb soname problems
  • From: Thomas Vander Stichele
• Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Summary from the last weeks FESCo meeting
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Virtuals for webserver and fastcgi
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: comps comps-fe6.xml,1.2,1.3
  • From: Wart
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: rpms/qt4/devel qt4.spec, NONE, 1.1 qtrc, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: rpms/qt4/devel qt4.spec, NONE, 1.1 qtrc, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
  • From: Ralf Ertzinger
• Re: rpms/qt4/devel qt4.spec, NONE, 1.1 qtrc, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: rpms/qt4/devel qt4.spec, NONE, 1.1 qtrc, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: rpms/qt4/devel qt4.spec, NONE, 1.1 qtrc, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
  • From: Jose' Matos
• Re: rpms/qt4/devel qt4.spec, NONE, 1.1 qtrc, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: rpms/qt4/devel qt4.spec, NONE, 1.1 qtrc, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Removing noise from specs
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: rpms/qt4/devel qt4.spec, NONE, 1.1 qtrc, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: rpms/qt4/devel qt4.spec, NONE, 1.1 qtrc, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: rpms/qt4/devel qt4.spec, NONE, 1.1 qtrc, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: rpms/qt4/devel qt4.spec, NONE, 1.1 qtrc, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Removing noise from specs
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Greedy install
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Packaging guidelines: buildroot
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Greedy install
  • From: Jose' Matos
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Removing noise from specs
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Removing noise from specs
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Packaging guidelines: buildroot
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: comps comps-fe6.xml,1.2,1.3
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: Greedy install
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Example mock config
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: Greedy install
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Greedy install
  • From: Axel Thimm
• adding a page in wiki?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Packaging guidelines: buildroot
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Packaging guidelines: buildroot
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Packaging guidelines: buildroot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Packaging guidelines: buildroot
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: The "Summary - Broken dependencies" emails.
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: The "Summary - Broken dependencies" emails.
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Packaging guidelines: buildroot
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Packaging guidelines: buildroot
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Packaging guidelines: buildroot
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Packaging guidelines: buildroot
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Packaging guidelines: buildroot
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• The "Summary - Broken dependencies" emails.
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Packaging guidelines: buildroot
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Packaging guidelines: buildroot
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Packaging guidelines: buildroot
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Packaging guidelines: buildroot
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Packaging guidelines: buildroot
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-17
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-17
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-05-17
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-17
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Packaging guidelines: buildroot
  • From: seth vidal
• Packaging guidelines: buildroot
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Re: epydoc <arch> -> noarch transition problems
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: epydoc <arch> -> noarch transition problems
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Remove goupil in the FE system build
  • From: Damien Durand
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: epydoc <arch> -> noarch transition problems
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: buildsys-build (Was Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison)
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-17
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-17
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-05-17
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-17
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• [Bug 180066] Request: Inclusion of a ruby template file
  • From: bugzilla
• Re: buildsys-build (Was Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: buildsys-build (Was Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison)
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: buildsys-build (Was Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison)
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: buildsys-build (Was Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison)
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• buildsys-build (Was Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: Paul Howarth
• unorphan...
  • From: Michael J Knox
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: sponsorship for package adoption without package submission (was Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount)
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: package updates for in all repos at the same time (Was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: sponsorship for package adoption without package submission (was Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount)
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: FESCo Nomination
  • From: Andreas Bierfert
• BuildRequires - flex and bison
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: question on Individual Contributor License Agreement (CLA)
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: question on Individual Contributor License Agreement (CLA)
  • From: Jima
• question on Individual Contributor License Agreement (CLA)
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: sponsorship for package adoption without package submission (was Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Some ftp space for SRPM for review wanted
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: sponsorship for package adoption without package submission (was Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount)
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: epydoc <arch> -> noarch transition problems
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: epydoc <arch> -> noarch transition problems
  • From: Shahms King
• Re: sponsorship for package adoption without package submission (was Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount)
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: sponsorship for package adoption without package submission (was Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: sponsorship for package adoption without package submission (was Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: sponsorship for package adoption without package submission (was Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount)
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: FESCo Elections 2006
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Some ftp space for SRPM for review wanted
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: sponsorship for package adoption without package submission (was Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount )
  • From: Jose' Matos
• Re: sponsorship for package adoption without package submission (was Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: sponsorship for package adoption without package submission (was Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount)
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: sponsorship for package adoption without package submission (was Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount)
  • From: Michael J Knox
• Re: AWOL owners and stale packages.
  • From: Michael J Knox
• Re: sponsorship for package adoption without package submission (was Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: sponsorship for package adoption without package submission (was Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount)
  • From: Michael J Knox
• sponsorship for package adoption without package submission (was Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Suggestion for new packages: avr-gcc, avr-binutils, avr-libc, avrdude, uisp, avra
  • From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
• Re: Kernel modules in Fedora Extras
  • From: Jima
• Re: SSL certificate of https://admin.fedora.redhat.com/
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Re: SSL certificate of https://admin.fedora.redhat.com/
  • From: Callum Lerwick
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-15
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-15
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-15
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-15
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jose' Matos
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• [Bug 185606] Template file for libraries
  • From: bugzilla
• Re: Kernel modules in Fedora Extras
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Remove orphans in devel (Was: Re: atitvout + gai-pal : Orphaned dependencies!)
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: xosd, lrmi, and tpb
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• new pork maintainer
  • From: Luke Macken
• Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Re: upstream renamed app, simple update, or new review required?
  • From: Peter Gordon
• upstream renamed app, simple update, or new review required?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• help with build error
  • From: Steven Pritchard
• Re: Kernel modules in Fedora Extras
  • From: Dan Williams
• Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Kernel modules in Fedora Extras
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• xosd, lrmi, and tpb
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• epydoc <arch> -> noarch transition problems
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: FE Package Status of May 12, 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: FE Package Status of May 12, 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: FE Package Status of May 12, 2006
  • From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
• Re: FE Package Status of May 12, 2006
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Kernel modules in Fedora Extras
  • From: Dan Williams
• Re: Kernel modules in Fedora Extras
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Remove orphans in devel (Was: Re: atitvout + gai-pal : Orphaned dependencies!)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-15
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Remove orphans in devel (Was: Re: atitvout + gai-pal : Orphaned dependencies!)
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Kernel modules in Fedora Extras
  • From: Dan Williams
• Re: mock builds broken on FC5 machines
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Remove orphans in devel (Was: Re: atitvout + gai-pal : Orphaned dependencies!)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Some ftp space for SRPM for review wanted
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Some ftp space for SRPM for review wanted
  • From: Laurent Rineau
• Re: Some ftp space for SRPM for review wanted
  • From: Sander Hoentjen
• Re: Some ftp space for SRPM for review wanted
  • From: Sander Hoentjen
• Some ftp space for SRPM for review wanted
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: License query
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Maelstrom license clause
  • From: Linus Walleij
• GNOME packages that need review?
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: mock builds broken on FC5 machines
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: libfoo<major> (was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Packages guidelines: documentation subpackages name
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Packages guidelines: documentation subpackages name
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Incoming: directfb soname problems
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Packages guidelines: documentation subpackages name
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: mock builds broken on FC5 machines
  • From: Russell Harrison
• Re: package updates for in all repos at the same time (Was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: package updates for in all repos at the same time (Was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Maelstrom license clause
  • From: Linus Walleij
• Packages guidelines: documentation subpackages name
  • From: Laurent Rineau
• Re: Maelstrom license clause
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: package updates for in all repos at the same time (Was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: package updates for in all repos at the same time (Was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Packages guidelines: documentation subpackages name
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Kernel modules in Fedora Extras
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Kernel modules in Fedora Extras
  • From: Sean Bruno
• Re: package updates for in all repos at the same time (Was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: package updates for in all repos at the same time (Was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: libfoo<major> (was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: mono / ".pc files in -devel packges" guideline
  • From: Brian Pepple
• Re: package updates for in all repos at the same time (Was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: mono / ".pc files in -devel packges" guideline
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: package updates for in all repos at the same time (Was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)
  • From: Hans de Goede
• twinkle?
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: libfoo<major> (was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: libfoo<major> (was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• package updates for in all repos at the same time (Was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: mock builds broken on FC5 machines
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Trouble with incomplete Binary RPMs
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Trouble with incomplete Binary RPMs
  • From: Jochen Schmitt
• democracy tv?
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: package updates for in all repos at the same time (Was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: License query
  • From: Linus Walleij
• Re: package updates for in all repos at the same time (Was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: libfoo<major> (was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-12
  • From: Josh Boyer
• libfoo<major> (was: Incoming: directfb soname problems)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Incoming: directfb soname problems
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Incoming: directfb soname problems
  • From: Thomas Vander Stichele
• Re: Incoming: directfb soname problems
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Suggestion for new packages: avr-gcc, avr-binutils, avr-libc, avrdude, uisp, avra
  • From: Hans de Goede
• mock builds broken on FC5 machines
  • From: Russell Harrison
• Re: FE/development builds failing, missing deps
  • From: Brian Pepple
• Incoming: directfb soname problems
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: AWOL owners and stale packages.
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• FE/development builds failing, missing deps
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: development/guile-devel
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-11]
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Suggestion for new packages: avr-gcc, avr-binutils, avr-libc, avrdude, uisp, avra
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-11]
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: How do I know if someone is already working on a package?
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: Squirrelmail plugin packaging naming
  • From: Steven Pritchard
• Re: rpms/perl-Module-Build/devel .cvsignore, 1.9, 1.10 perl-Module-Build.spec, 1.15, 1.16 sources, 1.9, 1.10
  • From: Steven Pritchard
• Suggestion for new packages: avr-gcc, avr-binutils, avr-libc, avrdude, uisp, avra
  • From: Till Maas
• Claiming ownership for thinkpad related packages and pam_mount
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: rpms/perl-Module-Build/devel .cvsignore, 1.9, 1.10 perl-Module-Build.spec, 1.15, 1.16 sources, 1.9, 1.10
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-11]
  • From: Eric Tanguy
• Re: How do I know if someone is already working on a package?
  • From: Jima
• Re: Maelstrom license clause
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-12
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-12
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-12
  • From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Re: FE Package Status of May 12, 2006
  • From: Michael J Knox
• Maelstrom license clause
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: rpms/perl-Module-Build/devel .cvsignore, 1.9, 1.10 perl-Module-Build.spec, 1.15, 1.16 sources, 1.9, 1.10
  • From: Steven Pritchard
• Drop inti package
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• Re: AWOL owners and stale packages.
  • From: Michael J Knox
• Re: FE Package Status of May 12, 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: FE Package Status of May 12, 2006
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• FE Package Status of May 12, 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: Buildsys stuck?
  • From: Dan Williams
• Buildsys stuck?
  • From: Quentin Spencer
• Re: License query
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
• Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-11]
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: How do I know if someone is already working on a package?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: How do I know if someone is already working on a package?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: How do I know if someone is already working on a package?
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: How do I know if someone is already working on a package?
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: How do I know if someone is already working on a package?
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: How do I know if someone is already working on a package?
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-11]
  • From: Eric Tanguy
• Re: How do I know if someone is already working on a package?
  • From: Peter Gordon
• How do I know if someone is already working on a package?
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: rpms/perl-Module-Build/devel .cvsignore, 1.9, 1.10 perl-Module-Build.spec, 1.15, 1.16 sources, 1.9, 1.10
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: mono / ".pc files in -devel packges" guideline
  • From: Chris Weyl
• Re: License query
  • From: Nils Philippsen
• Re: mono / ".pc files in -devel packges" guideline
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: mono / ".pc files in -devel packges" guideline
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: mono / ".pc files in -devel packges" guideline
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: mono / ".pc files in -devel packges" guideline
  • From: Chris Weyl
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• WARNING - php-eaccellerator update
  • From: David Cary Hart
• Re: License query
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: mono / ".pc files in -devel packges" guideline
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: License query
  • From: Nils Philippsen
• License query
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-11]
  • From: Ralf Ertzinger
• Re: AWOL owners and stale packages.
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-11]
  • From: PFJ
• [Fwd: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-11]
  • From: Eric TANGUY
• stellarium is broken on FC-4
  • From: Alex Lancaster
• Re: Documentation-only packages
  • From: Peter Gordon
• AWOL owners and stale packages.
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• New python-clientform owner
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-11
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-11
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-11
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: mono / ".pc files in -devel packges" guideline
  • From: Brian Pepple
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Documentation-only packages
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Re: Documentation-only packages
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: mono / ".pc files in -devel packges" guideline
  • From: Chris Weyl
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: extras-buildsys/utils extras-push-new,1.8,1.9
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: mono / ".pc files in -devel packges" guideline
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• mono / ".pc files in -devel packges" guideline
  • From: Chris Weyl
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: repodata on download.fedora.redhat.com not up to date (and inconsistent)
  • From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
• Re: repodata on download.fedora.redhat.com not up to date
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: repodata on download.fedora.redhat.com not up to date
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: repodata on download.fedora.redhat.com not up to date
  • From: Laurent Rineau
• repodata on download.fedora.redhat.com not up to date
  • From: orion
• [Bug 175237] Review Request: bzr - bazaar-ng distributed revision control system
  • From: bugzilla
• Re: SSL certificate of https://admin.fedora.redhat.com/
  • From: Jima
• Re: SSL certificate of https://admin.fedora.redhat.com/
  • From: Laurent Rineau
• Re: SSL certificate of https://admin.fedora.redhat.com/
  • From: Jima
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• SSL certificate of https://admin.fedora.redhat.com/
  • From: Laurent Rineau
• Re: Splitting content and engine for games where they come 1 one upstream tarbal
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: Splitting content and engine for games where they come 1 one upstream tarbal
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Documentation-only packages
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Splitting content and engine for games where they come 1 one upstream tarbal
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Documentation-only packages
  • From: Peter Gordon
• [Bug 175237] Review Request: bzr - bazaar-ng distributed revision control system
  • From: bugzilla
• [Bug 175237] Review Request: bzr - bazaar-ng distributed revision control system
  • From: bugzilla
• Splitting content and engine for games where they come 1 one upstream tarbal
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Emacs CVS for Fedora Core 5
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Re: Desktop entries and terminal applications.
  • From: Dawid Gajownik
• Re: Documentation-only packages
  • From: Chris Weyl
• Re: Desktop entries and terminal applications.
  • From: Dawid Gajownik
• Re: Desktop entries and terminal applications.
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: syck-python / request to orphan / wanting to replace with pyyaml.org's YAML stuff
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: buildsys dead?
  • From: Laurent Rineau
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Documentation-only packages
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: Desktop entries and terminal applications.
  • From: Dawid Gajownik
• [Bug 176288] Review Request: kdemultimedia-extras
  • From: bugzilla
• Re: Desktop entries and terminal applications.
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Still not getting any closer with mock
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Desktop entries and terminal applications.
  • From: Dawid Gajownik
• Re: FESCo Elections 2006
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Still not getting any closer with mock
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Still not getting any closer with mock
  • From: Paul
• Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
  • From: buildsys
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Quentin Spencer
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
• Re: Documentation-only packages
  • From: Don Russell
• Re: Documentation-only packages
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: Documentation-only packages
  • From: Chris Weyl
• Re: Trouble with uploading sources to cvs
  • From: Jochen Schmitt
• Documentation-only packages
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: fedorabugs process...
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Squirrelmail plugin packaging naming
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: fedorabugs process...
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Russell Harrison
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Russell Harrison
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Anthony Green
• Re: fedorabugs process...
  • From: Chris Weyl
• Re: fedorabugs process...
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: FESCo Elections 2006
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: fedorabugs process...
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: fedorabugs process...
  • From: Chris Weyl
• Re: fedorabugs process...
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: FESCo Elections 2006
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Gérard Milmeister
• fedorabugs process...
  • From: Chris Weyl
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Anthony Green
• Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
  • From: Aurelien Bompard
• Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• package naming question: muse -vs - MusE
  • From: Anthony Green
• Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
  • From: Aurelien Bompard