Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Aurelien Bompard schrieb:

> As a consequence, since 1.4 final there is no engine available on x86_64.
> 
> There is no clean way to reactivate the gstreamer engine (gone from the
> tarball), so I'm thinking about ExcludArch'ing Amarok in the same way as
> HelixPlayer. It's pretty sad because it means x86_64 users won't have it,
> even if they can get the xine engine plugin from /somewhere else/.

> Do you see any other option ?

No, this is the best temporary solution, until we have a engine for
x86_64 that can ship with fedora.

We really should update at least the other archs, as they currently ship
with a 1.4beta3 version which has some really nasty bugs that are fixed
in 1.4 final. So staying at 1.4beta3 and pushing 1.4 final only into
devel like Ville suggested is a bad idea for the majority of people.

In my opinion Aurelien should release the final packages for all
possible architectures and stay at version 1.4beta3 in x86_64 until a
solution is found for the missing sound engine. When there is one, we
can release a new package for all archs including this solution. Doing
so, we improve stability for the majority of users a lot and we do not
lessen stability for x86_64 users.



Cheers,

Jens

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux