Re: Trouble with the new Amarok version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Kofler wrote:
> What about just taking it from SVN (or failing that, from the Beta 3
> tarball, but you should probably be able to get the latest version from
> KDE SVN) and add it as an extra Source1? While this may upset the amaroK
> developers, it's IMHO the cleanest solution from the users' perspective.

OK, so I finally did that. I took the gstreamer engine from beta3 (I tried
and failed with SVN, because I couldn't get automake to generate the
Makefile.in properly).
I've added back the gstreamer 0.10 engine only for the archs where
HelixPlayer is unavailable (mainly x86_64), so the amarok devs shouldn't be
too upset.

Thanks to all for your advice

Aurélien
-- 
http://aurelien.bompard.org  ~~~~  Jabber : abompard@xxxxxxxxx
Programmer: A biological system designed
to convert coffee and pizza into code.


-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux