On 22/05/06, Christopher Stone <chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It would seem to me that if auctex is only usable for emacs (and not xemacs) then it would be named emacs-auctex. Simple as that. If auctex can be used for both emacs and xemacs then it would be called emacs-common-auctex. I'm not sure where the confusion lies?
That's not what the guideline says. That's (part of) the problem. The guideline specifically insists that emacs-auctex be renamed to emacs-common-auctex (go read it and see).
It seems to me you are over-thinking this issue, and trying to make it more complicated than it actually is.
Yes, I did over think it. Then I realized what the simple solution was (see the emacs-muse.spec). Unfortunately, I made other people over think it too in the process. I suck :) The problem is that the Guideline is unecessarily complicated, when a much simpler and logical alternative exists. J. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
