Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23/05/06, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It would be nice. The unmentionable repo does not operate in the same
> way as FE, as far as I can tell -

What makes you say that?  At least from my point of view, it's pretty close.

I was harbouring the misconception that one couldn't submit packages
to livna - Thorsten in another mail points out that that's not the
case. Apologies if I appeared to be critical of livna - that wasn't my
intention - I guess I wasn't aware that things were as similar "under
the hood" with livna and FE as they actually are.

Jonathan

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux