Re: scientific license - fedora compatible?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/23/06, Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It would be nice. The unmentionable repo does not operate in the same
way as FE, as far as I can tell - it would be really nice to have a
repo for non-commercial stuff not allowed in extras, let's called it
Luvna, which uses the same infrastructure as FE, and which is open to
contributors.

Shouldn't we call them "freeluvna" and "non-freeluvna" then? :)

--
Konstantin Ryabitsev
Montréal, Québec

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux