Jonathan Underwood wrote: > On 23/05/06, Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx> > wrote: >> Which brings us the a point which we have been over and over again. We >> could really use a Non Free or Non Commercial repo for stuff like this, >> I know we have the repo which may not be named, but the may not be named >> is exactly the problem, if we want to cater as wide an audience as >> possible (and IMHO we do) we could really use a Non Commercial repo. > > It would be nice. The unmentionable repo does not operate in the same > way as FE, as far as I can tell - What makes you say that? At least from my point of view, it's pretty close. -- Rex -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
