On 5/14/06, Christopher Stone <chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 5/14/06, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 17:12 +0200, Laurent Rineau wrote: > > At http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation we > > can read "it is recommended to use *-doc as the subpackage name", whereas in > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines we can read > > "- MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -docs subpackage." > > > > So, could we agree on one policy? FC and FE seem to mix the two styles of > > naming. Looking at /var/cache/yum/{core,extras}/primary.xml.gz, if found in > > fe5: > > 30 "-doc" > > 19 "-docs" > > and in fc5: > > 16 "-doc" > > 5 "-docs" > > +1 to -doc. > > There's also -manual which could fall into the same category and > packaged just as -doc. Someone will probably argue that -doc should be > reserved for subpackages and -manual for ones that are built from their > own SRPM, I'll say in advance that I disagree and the user doesn't > care :) According to the Package Review guidelines it should be "docs". - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -docs subpackage.
Whoops didn't read the whole thread, you can ignore my last message, or just count it as +1 for docs ;-) -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
