On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 18:15 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Am Montag, den 15.05.2006, 10:45 -0400 schrieb Dan Williams: > > On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 20:44 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > Hi All! > > > > > > Just FYI, I took the old kernel-module proposal and reworked the > > > document a bit and put it in the proper place at: > > > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules > > > > > > Might sill be a bit rough and the standard and the page still needs some > > > finetuning. But it's probably a lot better than before. > > > > Is there anything needed from the buildsystem for this? AFAIK you can > > already to i686, i586, ppc, and x86_64 kernel modules. > > Well, in and ideal world plague, mock or something else would pass the > > - version of the latest kernel to the rpmbuild-call via "--define > kversion foo" > - all variants (smp, "", xen0, xenU, ...) via "--define kvariants bar > baz" > > when building the package. That would avoid the hardcoding of those vars > in the spec file. I think we can do that in a sane way, yes. > > ppc64iseries and > > ppc64 support isn't there yet though... > > ppc64 would probably require a special builder afaik where *.ppc64 isn't > excluded? I tried that once -- worked fine. Well, AFAIK Fedora runs 32-bit on ppc64 except for the kernel and possibly glibc (?) just like sparc64, so usually we'd exclude all *.ppc64 from the pull anyway. Dan -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
