Re: FE Package Status of May 12, 2006

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi folks,

The page has been updated. Thorsten asked if we could highlight a bit those folks who perform many reviews but are not yet sponsors, so I have added some coloring to the page.

Actually, I kinda like colors :)  Maybe other things could be colorized too...

Another thing I was wondering: do you prefer people's names, or do you prefer the pseudo-email addresses in the various listings ?

Visually, I tend to prefer just the name, but then it makes things a bit harder when trying to send an email to poke someone on an issue... But then again, I hope to automate the nagging emails at some point... so I'm kinda hesitating what to do.

Cheers,
					Christian

----

FE Package Status of May 12, 2006

The full report can be found here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/PackageStatus

The full report includes:

Packages appearing in Core but still present in CVS devel

We have 5 packages in CVS devel which appear to have moved to Core:

unifdef
check
libevent
glib
gtk+

At least for glib and gtk+, the packages have actually moved from Core to Extras, not the other way around.

Paul.

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux