-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Paul Howarth wrote: > Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> The page has been updated. Thorsten asked if we could highlight a bit >> those folks who perform many reviews but are not yet sponsors, so I >> have added some coloring to the page. >> >> Actually, I kinda like colors :) Maybe other things could be >> colorized too... >> >> Another thing I was wondering: do you prefer people's names, or do you >> prefer the pseudo-email addresses in the various listings ? >> >> Visually, I tend to prefer just the name, but then it makes things a >> bit harder when trying to send an email to poke someone on an issue... >> But then again, I hope to automate the nagging emails at some point... >> so I'm kinda hesitating what to do. >> >> Cheers, >> Christian >> >> ---- >> >> FE Package Status of May 12, 2006 >> >> The full report can be found here: >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/PackageStatus > > The full report includes: > >> Packages appearing in Core but still present in CVS devel >> >> We have 5 packages in CVS devel which appear to have moved to Core: >> >> unifdef >> check >> libevent >> glib >> gtk+ > > At least for glib and gtk+, the packages have actually moved from Core > to Extras, not the other way around. > unifdef - ------- Appeared first in rawhide then it was submitted to Extras for FC-4 and FC-5 (see ticket #190362). jpo - -- José Pedro Oliveira * mailto: jpo@xxxxxxxxxxxx * http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo * * gpg fingerprint = F9B6 8D87 859D 1C94 48F0 84C0 9749 9EB5 91BD 851B * -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEaLXKl0metZG9hRsRAlz6AJ9Z6n8RHuDMI96daKzCMFNfKL5dBQCgtpdC /OqdYzX3i9LLhPaoKR0ZaII= =UeZC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
