On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 08:24:17AM -0700, Chris Weyl wrote: > On 5/9/06, Tim Jackson <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >1. Naming. "php-docs" would fit with the usual convention. "php-manual" > >would be more descriptive of what it actually is. Preferences anyone? > > That's not uncommon; a quick search shows 20 packages name *-manual. > Admittedly most are in core, but packages like httpd-manual have been > around for as long as I can remember using redhat. I'd think -manual > makes more sense for a standalone package, if I saw X-docs show up in > extras I'd probably wonder where X was. Right. -doc(s) packages tend to be subpackages, so -manual makes more sense to me as well. josh -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
