Paul Howarth (paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Why isn't this the default for RPM, either patched into the default > > RPM package, or in redhat-rpm-config? > > If you take an SRPM with no BuildRoot: and try to build to build it as a > regular user on just about any system it'll fail because nobody AFAIK > currently ships an rpm package with a default buildroot. So even if it's > fixed in rpm or mock, it'll be a while before it's safe to remove > BuildRoot: tags if the packager wants any semblance of portability. I see no reason why the default can't be pulled from the stock system RPM macros; in fact, that's the logical place for it, rather than per-package. Bill -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
