On 15/05/06, Jose' Matos <jamatos@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Almost OT but what is missing for this subpackage to be available? I am using lyx and it would be a nice addition to lyx spec file: Require(hint): tetex-preview I am also willing to help with testing. :-)
Well, for a while it was waiting for the tetex packager to remove the preview latex documentation spuriosly packaged with tetex. He's kindly done that now. All it now requires is for me to submit builds of emacs-auctex which build the tetex-preview subpackage , and, importantly for the package naming issues to be cleared up, although, hopefully, if FESCO chose the right package naming (i.e. emacs-foo), we won't have to change auctex. :) J. I'll do it by this weekend, all being well. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
