On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 19:51 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Yeah, we might have grown so far that we need to limit access in CVS a > bit more. We probably need to "add layers of control and management and > procedures" to make everything more safe. Err, careful. Personally I'd like to encourage more collective ownership in Extras. Locking things off would put a damper on this. What really needs to happen is simply make it impossible to bypass the commit emails. (Though something more along the lines of "Package Stewardship" seems more appropriate) http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?CodeStewardship
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
