Fedora Extras
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Pitivi package will not build using plague
- Re: Pitivi package will not build using plague
- Re: Package reviews (suggestion)
- From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
- Re: Adding a new mirror to the Extras mirror list
- Re: Best practices wrt. Changelog entries in spec file (upstream vs. specfile)
- Re: Packaging guidelines for web applications?
- Re: Mock problem
- Re: Mock problem
- Adding a new mirror to the Extras mirror list
- Re: Mock problem
- Re: Mock problem
- Mock problem
- Package reviews.
- Pitivi package will not build using plague
- Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
- Re: FE-ACCEPT when sponsor needed
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: FE-ACCEPT when sponsor needed
- Re: FE-ACCEPT when sponsor needed
- Orphan process.
- Mono SIG
- Re: Packaging guidelines for web applications?
- Trouble with uploading sources to cvs
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-07
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-07
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-05-07
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-07
- Re: Trouble while uploading source to CVS
- Trouble while uploading source to CVS
- Re: Packaging guidelines for web applications?
- Re: Packaging guidelines for web applications?
- Re: Packaging guidelines for web applications?
- Re: Packaging guidelines for web applications?
- Packaging guidelines for web applications?
- Summary from the last FESCo meeting
- Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
- Re: Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Re: Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Re: Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Re: QSA (Qt Script for Applications)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- QSA (Qt Script for Applications)
- evince [was: Re: evince, pdf and two side printing]
- Re: Best practices wrt. Changelog entries in spec file (upstream vs. specfile)
- Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
- Re: FE Package Status of May 06, 2006
- Re: FE Package Status of May 06, 2006
- Re: FE Package Status of May 06, 2006
- Re: FE Package Status of May 06, 2006
- Re: Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: FE Package Status of May 06, 2006
- Re: FE Package Status of May 06, 2006
- Re: FE Package Status of May 06, 2006
- Re: FE Package Status of May 06, 2006
- Re: FE Package Status of May 06, 2006
- From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
- Re: FE Package Status of May 06, 2006
- Re: Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Re: Not sure how to sort this mock problem
- FE Package Status of May 06, 2006
- Re: Not sure how to sort this mock problem
- Re: Not sure how to sort this mock problem
- Not sure how to sort this mock problem
- Re: yakuake orphaned in FC5?
- Re: Best practices wrt. Changelog entries in spec file (upstream vs. specfile)
- Re: yakuake orphaned in FC5?
- Re: yakuake orphaned in FC5?
- Re: Best practices wrt. Changelog entries in spec file (upstream vs. specfile)
- Re: Best practices wrt. Changelog entries in spec file (upstream vs. specfile)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Best practices wrt. Changelog entries in spec file (upstream vs. specfile)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Best practices wrt. Changelog entries in spec file (upstream vs. specfile)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Best practices wrt. Changelog entries in spec file (upstream vs. specfile)
- Re: passing macros into mock
- Re: Best practices wrt. Changelog entries in spec file (upstream vs. specfile)
- Re: Best practices wrt. Changelog entries in spec file (upstream vs. specfile)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Where to install application .py files?
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-05
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-05
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-05
- Re: passing macros into mock
- Re: Where to install application .py files?
- Where to install application .py files?
- Re: Best practices wrt. Changelog entries in spec file (upstream vs. specfile)
- Re: passing macros into mock
- Re: passing macros into mock
- Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
- passing macros into mock
- Re: buildsys dead?
- buildsys dead?
- Fesco nomination
- FESCo Nomination
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: FE-ACCEPT when sponsor needed
- Re: FE-ACCEPT when sponsor needed
- Re: Best practices wrt. Changelog entries in spec file (upstream vs. specfile)
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: FE-ACCEPT when sponsor needed
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: FE-ACCEPT when sponsor needed
- Re: FE-ACCEPT when sponsor needed
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: FE-ACCEPT when sponsor needed
- Re: FE-ACCEPT when sponsor needed
- Re: FE-ACCEPT when sponsor needed
- Re: FE-ACCEPT when sponsor needed
- Re: FE-ACCEPT when sponsor needed
- Re: FE-ACCEPT when sponsor needed
- FE-ACCEPT when sponsor needed
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-04
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-04
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-04
- Re: Release bumps in old branches
- Re: Release bumps in old branches
- Re: Release bumps in old branches
- Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
- FESCo self-nomination
- Re: Release bumps in old branches
- Re: Release bumps in old branches
- Re: Release bumps in old branches
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: syck-python / request to orphan / wanting to replace with pyyaml.org's YAML stuff
- Release bumps in old branches
- Re: What's going on with devel builds?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- What's going on with devel builds?
- Re: Contributer License Agreement / Account System Problems
- Contributer License Agreement / Account System Problems
- Re: FESCo Elections 2006
- Re: FESCo Elections 2006
- Re: FESCo Elections 2006
- Re: FESCo Elections 2006
- Re: FESCo Elections 2006
- Re: FESCo Elections 2006
- Re: FESCo Elections 2006
- [Bug 172803] Review Request: openssl097f - compat package to help transitioning to new openssl
- [Bug 172803] Review Request: openssl097f - compat package to help transitioning to new openssl
- Re: FESCo Elections 2006
- Re: FESCo Elections 2006
- Re: FESCo Elections 2006
- unorphan: lua
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-03
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-03
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-03
- Re: Taking ownership of perl-XML-DOM and requirements
- Re: syck-python / request to orphan / wanting to replace with pyyaml.org's YAML stuff
- Re: evince, pdf and two side printing
- Re: syck-python / request to orphan / wanting to replace with pyyaml.org's YAML stuff
- yakuake orphaned in FC5?
- evince, pdf and two side printing
- changes to the orphaned wiki page.
- Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
- syck-python / request to orphan / wanting to replace with pyyaml.org's YAML stuff
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Building in mock vs building outside of mock
- Re: Building in mock vs building outside of mock
- Building in mock vs building outside of mock
- Re: optional game music files
- Re: comps where to put electronics simulation software (gnucap)?
- Re: optional game music files
- Re: optional game music files
- Re: optional game music files
- Re: optional game music files
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: optional game music files
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: plague question
- Re: plague question
- Re: plague question
- plague question
- From: Konstantin Ryabitsev
- Re: comps where to put electronics simulation software (gnucap)?
- Re: upload.cgi (Error 255)
- Re: upload.cgi (Error 255)
- comps where to put electronics simulation software (gnucap)?
- [Bug 179852] FC4 buildsys fails - FC4 mock succeeds - wine-docs package
- Re: upload.cgi (Error 255)
- Re: upload.cgi (Error 255)
- From: Konstantin Ryabitsev
- upload.cgi (Error 255)
- From: Konstantin Ryabitsev
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- FESCo Elections 2006
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-05-01
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-05-01
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-05-01
- Re: optional game music files
- Re: Unorphan: arc
- Re: Unorphan: arc
- Re: Removing packages (was Unorphan: arc)
- Re: optional game music files
- Re: Removing packages (was Unorphan: arc)
- Re: optional game music files
- Re: optional game music files
- Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
- Re: How forbidden is RPATH?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Removing packages (was Unorphan: arc)
- Re: Unorphan: arc
- Re: Unorphan: arc
- Re: cvs-import.sh problem (somewhat urgent)
- Re: Unorphan: arc
- Re: cvs-import.sh problem (somewhat urgent)
- Re: How forbidden is RPATH?
- Re: [Bug 169717] Review Request: Internode DSL usage applet
- Re: How forbidden is RPATH?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: cvs-import.sh problem (somewhat urgent)
- Re: optional game music files
- Re: cvs-import.sh problem (somewhat urgent)
- cvs-import.sh problem (somewhat urgent)
- Major Update and User Config
- Re: Unorphan: monkey-bubble
- optional game music files
- Orphaned: pam_mount, a PAM module that can mount volumes for a user session
- Re: How forbidden is RPATH?
- Re: Unorphan: monkey-bubble
- Re: Unorphan: monkey-bubble
- Re: Unorphan: arc
- Re: Unorphan: monkey-bubble
- Re: Unorphan: arc
- Re: Unorphan: monkey-bubble
- Re: Unorphan: monkey-bubble
- Re: Unorphan: monkey-bubble
- Re: Unorphan: monkey-bubble
- Re: Best practices wrt. Changelog entries in spec file (upstream vs. specfile)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Best practices wrt. Changelog entries in spec file (upstream vs. specfile)
- Re: Unorphan: arc
- Re: Best practices wrt. Changelog entries in spec file (upstream vs. specfile)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-04-30
- Re: Unorphan: arc
- Summary from the last FESCO meeting
- Re: Status of yakuake
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Unorphan: arc
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-04-30
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-04-30
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-04-30
- Re: How forbidden is RPATH?
- Re: How forbidden is RPATH?
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Best practices wrt. Changelog entries in spec file (upstream vs. specfile)
- Re: How forbidden is RPATH?
- Re: How forbidden is RPATH?
- How forbidden is RPATH?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-04-29
- Re: packaging java apps
- Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-04-29
- Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-04-29
- Re: homes for the homeless.
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: buildsystem stuck?
- Re: perl-MIME-Lite
- Re: buildsystem stuck?
- Re: Confusing use of EOL term
- Confusing use of EOL term
- Re: buildsystem stuck?
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: buildsystem stuck?
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: buildsystem stuck?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: buildsystem stuck?
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-04-29
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-04-29
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-04-29
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-04-29
- Re: package EOL
- Re: compat packages
- Re: package EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: buildsystem stuck?
- Re: compat packages
- Re: homes for the homeless.
- Re: i386 binaries in the x86_64 directories
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: package EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: buildsystem stuck?
- Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
- Re: package EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: buildsystem stuck?
- Re: packaging java apps
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- packaging java apps
- Re: package EOL
- Re: package EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: package EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: buildsystem stuck?
- buildsystem stuck?
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Setting share-mime-info prefix
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Setting share-mime-info prefix
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: package EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Dead Horse (was Re: package EOL)
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: package EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: FE Package Status of Apr 27, 2006
- Security Response Team / EOL
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: package EOL
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: FE Package Status of Apr 27, 2006
- [Bug 189342] Python egg spec template
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- [Bug 189342] Python egg spec template
- Re: FE Package Status of Apr 27, 2006
- Re: Brazilian softwares
- Brazilian softwares
- Re: rpms/proftpd/devel .cvsignore, 1.7, 1.8 proftpd.init, 1.4, 1.5 proftpd.spec, 1.13, 1.14 sources, 1.7, 1.8
- Re: rpms/proftpd/devel .cvsignore, 1.7, 1.8 proftpd.init, 1.4, 1.5 proftpd.spec, 1.13, 1.14 sources, 1.7, 1.8
- Re: FE Package Status of Apr 27, 2006
- Archive of bugzilla.fedora.us
- Re: FE Package Status of Apr 27, 2006
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Taking ownership of perl-XML-DOM and requirements
- Re: FE Package Status of Apr 27, 2006
- Re: rpms/proftpd/devel .cvsignore, 1.7, 1.8 proftpd.init, 1.4, 1.5 proftpd.spec, 1.13, 1.14 sources, 1.7, 1.8
- Re: FE Package Status of Apr 27, 2006
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- FE Package Status of Apr 27, 2006
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: Provides: and Obsoletes: to satisfy pre-extras package dependencies?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: Provides: and Obsoletes: to satisfy pre-extras package dependencies?
- Provides: and Obsoletes: to satisfy pre-extras package dependencies?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- weekly "new pacakges in Extras" (Was: Fedora Package Announcement List Split)
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- [Bug 174546] Review Request: trac
- Re: owners owners.list,1.901,1.902
- Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- [Bug 174546] Review Request: trac
- Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- Re: package EOL
- Re: package EOL
- Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- Re: How to remove a module from bugzilla for FE?
- Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- Re: How to remove a module from bugzilla for FE?
- Re: package EOL
- Re: package EOL
- How to remove a module from bugzilla for FE?
- Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- Re: package EOL
- Re: package EOL
- Re: package EOL
- Re: package EOL
- Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- Re: Getting pkgconfig to always point to /usr/lib/pkgconfig
- Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- From: Thomas Vander Stichele
- Re: Two quick questions
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: Getting pkgconfig to always point to /usr/lib/pkgconfig
- Re: Getting pkgconfig to always point to /usr/lib/pkgconfig
- Getting pkgconfig to always point to /usr/lib/pkgconfig
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-04-26
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-04-26
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-04-26
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-04-26
- ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: Two quick questions
- Two quick questions
- Re: package EOL
- Re: package EOL
- Re: package EOL
- Re: package EOL
- Re: Sponsorship process
- Re: package EOL
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: package EOL
- Re: package EOL
- Re: Re : iFolder server
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: package EOL
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: package EOL
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: package EOL
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: package EOL
- Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
- Re: package EOL
- Re: package EOL
- Re: package EOL
- Re: package EOL
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: package EOL
- Re: i386 binaries in the x86_64 directories
- Re: package EOL
- Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
- Re: package EOL
- Re: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
- Re: Namespace for (X)Emacs packages?
- Re: homes for the homeless.
- Namespace for (X)Emacs packages?
- package EOL
- Re: compat packages
- Re: homes for the homeless.
- Re: homes for the homeless.
- Re: homes for the homeless.
- Re: compat packages
- Re: homes for the homeless.
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- compat packages
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: homes for the homeless.
- Re: i386 binaries in the x86_64 directories
- i386 binaries in the x86_64 directories
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
- Re: homes for the homeless.
- Re: homes for the homeless.
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: homes for the homeless.
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: homes for the homeless.
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
- Re: homes for the homeless.
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: homes for the homeless.
- Re: homes for the homeless.
- Re: homes for the homeless.
- homes for the homeless.
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
- Re: Buildsystem broken; no %_initrddir macro?
- Re: Sponsorship process
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
- Re: Buildsystem broken; no %_initrddir macro?
- Buildsystem broken; no %_initrddir macro?
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: Sponsorship process
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
- taking ownership of gnome-themes-extras
- Re: taking ownership of screem
- Re: taking ownership of screem
- Re: taking ownership of screem
- taking ownership of screem
- Re: Header files in Perl packages
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-04-24
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-04-24
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-04-24
- [Bug 179852] FC4 buildsys fails - FC4 mock succeeds - wine-docs package
- [Bug 179852] FC4 buildsys fails - FC4 mock succeeds - wine-docs package
- Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Erlang package naming
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
- Re: Sponsorship process
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: extras-buildsys/utils extras-sign-move.py,1.11,1.12
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re : iFolder server
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- iFolder server
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: RFC: FESCo Future
- Re: extras-buildsys/utils extras-sign-move.py,1.11,1.12
- Re: extras-buildsys/utils extras-sign-move.py,1.11,1.12
- RFC: FESCo Future
- Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
- Re: The system doesn't always work
- Re: The system doesn't always work
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: The system doesn't always work
- Re: The system doesn't always work
- Re: The system doesn't always work
- Re: The system doesn't always work
- Re: getting started with fedora extras build system
- Re: getting started with fedora extras build system
- Re: The system doesn't always work
- Re: The system doesn't always work
- Re: getting started with fedora extras build system
- Re: RRDtool is in need of attention
- Re: The system doesn't always work
- The system doesn't always work
- Re: Sponsorship process
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Sponsorship process
- Re: Sponsorship process
- Re: Sponsorship process
- Re: Sponsorship process
- Re: Sponsorship process
- Re: Sponsorship process
- getting started with fedora extras build system
- Sponsorship process
- Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
- sylpheed-changes... (was: Changes explained (was: Re: Summary - Broken dependencies...))
- Re: Changes explained (was: Re: Summary - Broken dependencies...)
- Fedora Extras development Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report
- Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report
- Changes explained (was: Re: Summary - Broken dependencies...)
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-04-21
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-04-21
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-04-21
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-04-21
- Header files in Perl packages
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report
- Summary from this week's FESCo Meeting
- Re: up-imapproxy (Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-04-20)
- Re: failed cvs-import.sh -- what next?
- Summary from the FESCo-Meeting on April 13
- Re: up-imapproxy (Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-04-20)
- failed cvs-import.sh -- what next?
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora General Discussion]
[Fedora Art]
[Fedora Docs]
[Fedora Package Review]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite Backpacking]
[KDE Users]