Jonathan Underwood wrote:
One suggestion is, for a tarball foo.tar.gz, to call the package foo (i.e. foo.spec, foo-version.src.rpm) but have it build these binary packages: foo-version.rpm: containing files common to all emacs (eg. docs), and required by the packages below emacs-foo-version.rpm: specific byte compiled package for Emacs emacs-foo-el-version.rpm: elisp elisp source files for Emacs xemacs-foo-version.rpm: specific byte compiled package for XEmacs xemacs-foo-el-version.rpm: source elisp files installed for XEmacs
+1
This has the disadvantage that the module name is then foo in bugzilla, and not emacs-foo or xemacs-foo, which may confuse users.
No biggie. That's life. -- Rex -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
