On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 06:45 +1200, Michael J Knox wrote: > Brian Pepple wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 19:30 +1200, Michael J Knox wrote: > >> I am willing to take ownership of the following orphaned packages: > >> sodipodi > >> > > > > Should sodipodi be included in Extras again considering it's not being > > actively developed? Seems sorta pointless since it's successor Inkscape > > is already included in FE. > > > > > > Do you _know_ that the developer is not actively developing it? > Well, the projects last release was in February of 2004, and all bug reports for the last year or so have been unanswered by Lauris. Also, CVS appears not to have been touched for ages. Here's Lauris last message on the mailing list from back in March 2005: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=6795136&forum_id=3970 In my book, I would consider it not being actively developed. /B -- Brian Pepple <bdpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
