seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 15:23 +1200, Michael J. Knox wrote:
seth vidal wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 21:46 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
Yes, I agree. We want a mix of both old and new members at any one time.
That way, we don't get a radical change of plans or focus every year.
So, there are some members who want to leave FESCO at the moment. That is
fine. Thank them for their contributions and let them go. Then elect
enough members to make FESCO a governing body of 13. Then in 6 months,
those that were there already have their term up and you elect another half.
At the risk of sounding pessmistic - do we have 7 new people who
actually want the jobs? Also how do we handle the issue of security in
terms of the package-signing key during transitions? Clearly anyone
outgoing shouldn't keep access to the key.
I would certainly be interested in taking part in FESCO, though I doubt
my current level of presence and suitability in Fedora Extras is
probably not up to par with others, but I do think you would find the
right people easily enough.
Who says that someone _has_ to go at the end of 6months? Can they not be
re-elected if they have been nominated?
not saying they do but to be honest you have to be a special kind of
masochist to keep doing this stuff and not be paid for it.
Agreed... but masochist are abound.. I worked for a commercial distro
for 3 years with out being paid a cent.. :-) sadist? masochist? absolutely.
Michael
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
