On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 15:23 +1200, Michael J. Knox wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 21:46 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> Yes, I agree. We want a mix of both old and new members at any one time. > >> That way, we don't get a radical change of plans or focus every year. > >> > >> So, there are some members who want to leave FESCO at the moment. That is > >> fine. Thank them for their contributions and let them go. Then elect > >> enough members to make FESCO a governing body of 13. Then in 6 months, > >> those that were there already have their term up and you elect another half. > > > > At the risk of sounding pessmistic - do we have 7 new people who > > actually want the jobs? Also how do we handle the issue of security in > > terms of the package-signing key during transitions? Clearly anyone > > outgoing shouldn't keep access to the key. > > > > I would certainly be interested in taking part in FESCO, though I doubt > my current level of presence and suitability in Fedora Extras is > probably not up to par with others, but I do think you would find the > right people easily enough. > > Who says that someone _has_ to go at the end of 6months? Can they not be > re-elected if they have been nominated? not saying they do but to be honest you have to be a special kind of masochist to keep doing this stuff and not be paid for it. -sv -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
