On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 10:29 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 16:16 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > OK, > > > > => FESCO is a subordinate board of FPB > > => FPB is governing FESCO > > > > Now, with you being a member of both FESCO and FPB, please answer: > > > > * Are you FESCO's delegate/representative to FPB? > > nope Bad - Again, no democracy. > - I'm just zees guy, you know? :) > > I am a member of fesco and a member of the board - I don't really see > why there is a conflict of interest there. As you outlined, FPB is governing and directing FESCO. This is a conflict of interests. Your double-role would not be a problem if you had been elected/delegated, but you apparently have been not. > The goals of the board and of > fesco are pretty much oriented in the same direction. > > I'm not the only duplicate member b/t the board and fesco, either. > > jeremy katz is on both, too, iirc. But jeremy is everywhere - he is the > many-headed hydra :) I know, and it IS causing me headaches - Remember, we are not talking about particular persons, we are talking about roles, responsibilities, supervision, monitoring and control. > > * Did FESCO elect you as a member of FPB or has RH proclaimed/selected > > you? > > When the board was being selected I was asked if I would be willing to > be one of the people from the community to serve on this, the first > iteration, of the fedora project board. I agreed to do it. > > > not much drama in it. ATM, I am just asking questions to clarify things. Unfortunately, I sense no indication of democracy. Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
