On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 08:53:09PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > "Whom"? -- The current FESCo has the problem that some people are > quite inactive. So I (and some others, too) want to lay the hurdle to > get into FESCo a bit higher to have more active members in the future. > Some quotes from the IRC-Meeting in that context > - "I think we should have people that 1) show up for meetings 2) are > active leaders in Extras." > - "I think merit is a good measure of who belongs in FESCO." > - "if people want to join FESCO, they should write their own mission > statement, goals, objectives, etc." > Current plan to achieve it: Everyone (also current FESCo members!) who > wants to be member of the next FESCo needs to nominate him/herself on > fedora-extras-list; in that self-nomination-mail everyone needs to lay > down some plans what he or she wants to achieve when elected for FESCo. > Of course all fedora extras maintainers are allowed to nominate other > people for FESCo -- but the potential candidates still have to do lay > down their plans own their own. One small question: Should people that are on the Fedora Project Board also be allowed in FESCO? I personally don't have an issue with that, but at first glance that would seem to be largely pointless. And as a side question, what role does FESCO have in conjunction with the Project Board, if any? > - How is the Chair elected? > We have two options here afaics: > -- the new FESCo elects a (new) chair > -- the one with most votes in the election is nominated as FESCo-Chair; > if he does not want to do the job the one with the seconds most votes > gets the job offered, .... I think election of the chair by the FESCO members seems the way to go. Whether or not that will work out, who knows. josh -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
