Callum Lerwick wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 05:33 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
I would prefer the GPG signed method.
It seems like the best way to ensure that there isn't ballot stuffing
going on.
Yes. The thing to realize is you don't *have* to check signatures right
away. If we all vote with GPG signed emails, it can still serve as an
audit trail should anyone want to check up on it later.
Though I do agree a "Meritocracy, not democracy" philosophy. Having
existing FESCo members appoint replacements is possibly a good way to do
this. However there needs to be some kind of checks and balances.
Perhaps the existing FESCo can nominate new members, and the community
can confirm or veto. (Which still likely involves voting which makes me
wonder if this would really be substantially different. Oh well.)
What if the votes where done from within the accounts web page ?
Simple web form, easier to tally the results, only FE account holds can
vote..
Michael
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
