On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 15:00 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 21:55 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 11:40 -0700, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > > > Modified Files: > > > extras-sign-move.py > > > Log Message: > > > > > > if the file already exists, unlink it - this lets us sneak out silent > > > changes > > [...] > > > if not DEBUG: > > > + if os.path.exists(rpmloc): > > > + os.unlink(rpmloc) > > > shutil.copy2(package, rpmloc) > > > > Eh... rationale? We should be making sure that this _cannot_ happen, > > not make it easier or automatic. > > in this specific case I added it b/c some num-num updated their packages > w/o iterating the release. So we ended up with a conflict. If you'd like Ideally we should be gating this in the build system and fail packages that aren't "newer" than the last one built for a particular repository. Something I've wanted to do for a long time but, of course, requires some amount of yum-awareness in the build server. Which is in HEAD in rudimentary form. Dan -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
