Re: RFC: FESCo Future

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 00:46 +0200, Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx wrote:

> 
> I also do not see any rule that says *all* FESCo members must be elected.  
> Maybe a few could be delegates from the Fedora Project Board, to ensure some 
> consistency.

I like that idea.
I think there should be more elected than appointed, but four appointed
and nine elected is a good balance. There is some guidance in the
appointed members as necessary, but they are outnumbered by the
community elected by enough that they can't bulldoze how things are run.

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux