On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 13:59 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > I know there are packages which could do with an upstream split in code > and content so we could create seperate SRPMS for engine and content and > thus easily (relative small download) upgrade the engine for bug fixes / > new features. Yes - replacing large amounts of content that does not change for a small patch that has no effect on content whatsoever is an incredible waste of bandwidth, which some people have to pay for on a usage basis. There needs to be an exception defined to the rule for such cases, as splitting the static content from the code is a practice that should be encouraged, not discouraged. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
