On Fri, 05 May 2006 10:08:36 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "AT" == Andreas Thienemann <andreas@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > AT> Why not simply call rpm directly? > > AT> rpm -qp --changelog \ > AT> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/5/i386/mod_suphp-0.6.1-1.fc5.i386.rpm > > AT> This should give you the changelog for mod_suphp. > > We've come full circle. My point was that the changelog is all you > can see, so you should at least add a note of incompatible changes > there. We agree a bit and probably disagree a bit, too. This is not anymore how this thread started. All boils down to what you mean with "include a summary of major changes in your package %changelog", since I really think it is not a good idea to sum up upstream development changes in the package %changelog in general. The original post, which started this thread, is not yours. Joost Soeterbroek suggested | %changelog | * Date Name Packager | - package changelog | + upstream changelog which is not practicable. And with that I loop back to my earlier replies. ;) -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
