Re: Best practices wrt. Changelog entries in spec file (upstream vs. specfile)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "MS" == Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> writes:

MS> You can look _into_ rpms just fine and skim over any included
MS> ChangeLog, NEWS, README files.

Please tell us how you would do so.  Assume the usual case, that the
package is in a remote yum repo.

Remember that we have no announcement mechanism for Extras packages,
so we have no way to communicate possible incompatible updates to
users.  Obviously the idea is to not introduce any incompatible
changes within a single Fedora release, but eventually it's going to
happen and surely a sentence in the %changelog can do nothing but
help.

 - J<

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux