Re: Security Response Team / EOL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 02:40:43PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 28.04.2006, 14:20 +0200 schrieb Axel Thimm:
> > o Can there be consolidation of forces in fedora (core) legacy and
> >   fedora extras legacy?
> 
> "fedora extras legacy" is IMHO the wrong term -- I don't like it. I
> would prefer if we could avoid it. Why? See the discussion about the
> term "Legacy" that was on fedora-devel some weeks (months?) ago. 

I agree, I never really liked the name (it sounds like a burden), I'm
just using it to make the context clear.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpzgJkn7W2Ln.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux