Re: RFC: FESCo Future

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 17:36 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 11:20 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > > > > * Are you FESCO's delegate/representative to FPB?
> > > > 
> > > > nope
> > > Bad - Again, no democracy.
> > 
> > maybe I'm confused - where was the promise of democracy?
> 
> > > ATM, I am just asking questions to clarify things. Unfortunately, I
> > > sense no indication of democracy.
> > 
> > Again - where did the assumption of democracy come from?
> Then, I don't see any use in continuing this discussion.
> 
> Thorsten, why did you ask? It's apparent, the current system is not
> interested in democracy.

I didn't say there wasn't interest. Just that there was no promise that
it would, from the start, be democratic. As others have mentioned - it
never starts that way. Democracy evolves. Thorsten's suggestion is an
excellent evolutionary step toward electing members to fesco.


-sv


-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux