I think this is the first Erlang package in Extras: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 Am I wrong to interpret the naming guidelines to say that this package should be named erlang-esdl instead of just esdl? What about the Provides: esdl bit? Since this is the first Erlang package there aren't any guidelines to follow, but "esdl" seems awfully generic to me and there's already been at least one naming clash. (The poor Eiffel folks had to rename their SDL module.) Unfortunately other distros have chosen (poorly, IMHO) to just call it "esdl", so either way there's a conflict. - J< -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
