On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 10:48 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le samedi 29 avril 2006 à 05:17 +0200, Ralf Corsepius a écrit : > > > Sorry, but I beg to differ: > > > > IMO, > > * wanting to discontinue FC(N-1) at FC(N+1)test2 is a fault, because it > > doesn't provide a sufficient overlap to FC(N+1), for users wanting to > > upgrade from FC(N-1) to FC(N+1) [e.g. FC3->FC5]. > > Which is intentional on the FC side and I don't see why FE should be any > better. You know perfectly well the FC EOL is not designed to allow > FC(N-1) to FC(N+1). Their management's politics - Not mine, and probably not in many user's interest - I consider the current policy as not helpful, neither to RH nor to Fedora. Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
