On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 10:52 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > How about a compromise? Externally (toward the users) the official > position is that there is no official support (*) anymore other than > security fixes, while packagers are still allowed to update legacied' > releases at their own discretion w/o having to go through loops? Because no matter what we "say" is policy, end users would continue to see random packages change in EOL releases, which is not a clear message. Come on guys, if you need a longer lifespan than what Fedora provides (the full thing, including Legacy), mayhap you need to be looking for a different project. RHEL/CentOS exists for a reason. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
