On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 15:39 +0200, Laurent Rineau wrote: > On Thursday 04 May 2006 15:05, Michael A. Peters wrote: > > Bug #190396 - netpanzer > > > > At any rate - the bug should probably block the NEEDS-SPONSOR bug, to > > make it easier for potential sponsors to find. > > I have the same problem: I am the author of the following review request: > Bug #190070 – Review Request: par2cmdline > > The day after the creation of the request, it has been accepted, and added to > blockers of FE-ACCEPT. > > However, it was my first submission, and I tell that in the description of the > request. I added FE-NEEDSSPONSOR to blockers of my request, the day after, a > week ago. I suppose that my request awaits another review of a sponsor, so > that I am sponsored. > > Perhaps my request #190070 should no longer block FE-NEEDSSPONSOR. Please tell > me. > Personally, that bug should probably remain FE-NEEDSSPONSOR, and not be FE-ACCEPT, since it sounds like the person that approved your package cannot sponsor new contributors. /B -- Brian Pepple <bdpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
