> Should sodipodi be included in Extras again considering it's not being > actively developed? Seems sorta pointless since it's successor Inkscape > is already included in FE. Not actively developed packages are accepted in extras. Even packages without clear upstream or no upstream (this happens a lot for old packages that are fortunately often also very stable). Of course it is harder to attract maintainers when the package isn't actively developed and there is a successor, but my understanding is that it is not an issue. Having old packages that depend on old lib version shouldn't be a reason not to update the libs, however. So if there is trouble with the dependencies, then the maintainer will certainly have to package some compat packages so it may even become so annoying that the package is dropped, but it is not a requirements. -- Pat -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
