On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 13:43 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Maybe, but in a project based on voluntary work from packagers, > putting > constraint on them is likely to decrease their reactivness, and in > turn > it will harm the users. Otherwise said, if the "no updates" policy has > for consequence "Backporting is too much work, I won't bother for > that > EOL FE branch, let the security SIG do the backport if they want to", > it > is not a win for the user in my opinion. Policy doesn't say you can't use a version upgrade to resolve a security issue, as long as that is the motivation of the version upgrade. Package updates/upgrades just for the sake of the update/upgrade is what should be avoided. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
