Re: Security Response Team / EOL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Josh Bressers (bressers@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> There are other distributions that have used this policy in the past.  The
> result ends up being if the fix is bigger than a breadbox, it just never
> gets fixed.  The deciding factor should be which one is less invasive, and
> that decision should be up to the packagers and the security response team.
> There are times it's easier to apply a patch, there are times that one must
> upgrade.

A good example would be any sufficiently large and complex code base...
the mozilla stack would apply here - in many cases, backporting would
be an onerous task compared to simply upgrading to the new version with
the security fix.

Bill

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux